<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for richbradshaw</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-b22afd84" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/richbradshaw/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grooms men getting ready....</title><link>http://www.focalpix.co.uk/blog/394/grooms-men-getting-ready#comment-16103121</link><description>Timor looks good doesn't he!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The highest traffic site in the world doesn&amp;#8217;t close its HTML tags</title><link>http://blog.errorhelp.com/2009/06/27/the-highest-traffic-site-in-the-world-doesnt-close-its-html-tags/#comment-11848355</link><description>If you gzip your code, then this makes such a tiny difference that it's essentially pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't gzip it, then you should.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2009/how-to-use-twitter-as-an-error-log/#comment-7478174</link><description>I'm only using it for mission critical errors, so hopefully!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2009/how-to-use-twitter-as-an-error-log/#comment-7478147</link><description>There is another API method for directs, though I found it worked fine using a d .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolate Fountain Heaven!</title><link>http://www.focalpix.co.uk/blog/244/chocolate-fountain-heaven#comment-7451008</link><description>Always fancied having one of these at home...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2009/how-to-use-twitter-as-an-error-log/#comment-7285035</link><description>Yeah - you'd want the twitter account to be private for good reason. Been using this for a few days now, and it's really good - going to set it up as a matter of course from now on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 &amp;ndash; The agony and the glory</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/14951/windows-7-the-agony-and-the-glory/#comment-5044294</link><description>How much disk space does it take when installed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Macbook Air v. Netbooks</title><link>http://comments.deasil.com/2009/01/07/on-macbook-air-v-netbooks/#comment-4966937</link><description>See, I disagree. I have two 1st gen EEE pcs, and use them constantly. I'm a teacher, so I use it at work for all presenting in lessons etc as well as casual surfing at home. I've had them both quite a few months now and am glad I have them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I do regularly use them through external monitors for longer stretches. Right now it's through my 32" TV, which admittedly does help!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DISQUS and Facebook Connect under the mistletoe</title><link>http://blog.disqus.net/2008/12/16/disqus-and-facebook-connect/#comment-4434794</link><description>Do you need a seperate API key for every site you want to use?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:32:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just saying BANG! could kill them</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/7744/just-saying-bang-could-kill-them/#comment-3644999</link><description>I'm thinking that if they read this story that the bang in capital might prove fatal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jane's Tumblr</title><link>http://jquig99.tumblr.com/post/58806417#comment-3644765</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google 2001 is So Cool!</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/10/google-2001-is.html#comment-2775407</link><description>I'm going to start modifying peoples search boxes to search this instead of the usual google...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 ways to make using bash more productive</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/27/5-ways-to-make-using-bash-more-productive/#comment-2659556</link><description>Thanks - good to know I'm helping people out!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing dynamic XML sitemaps using PHP</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/13/writing-dynamic-xml-sitemaps-using-php/#comment-2521968</link><description>Good point - that's how I have it set up on my sites - probably should have mentioned that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some sites automatically guess that it should be at /sitemap.xml, so I'd recommend doing this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-2431090</link><description>That's how it's designed, each tab and plugin gets it's own process. That way, if one crashes it won't crash the whole browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read this for more details: &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_04.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/05/benchmarking-chromes-v8-javascript-engine/#comment-2180859</link><description>No, I was surprised too, and have run them with various different combinations. FF 3.1 has both the JIT options in about:config set to true and I restarted the machine. On these benchmarks it actually performs slightly slower than when they are set to false...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Weird - I'm going to update to the newest nightly today and try again, these benchmarks are with yesterdays nightly build.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:09:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-2145716</link><description>Remember that this is just on first boot, and doesn't simulate browsing at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flash takes up a huge amount of memory, as does Adobe Acrobat - both use about 3 times as much as Chrome it seems, so they might be the culprits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/09/02/google-chrome-memory-usage/#comment-2018111</link><description>Yeah, it's quick isn't it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Only quotes. - I have a web robot which is a Java app. I need to...</title><link>http://richbradshaw.tumblr.com/post/42814514#comment-941293</link><description>This is obviously to do with the first steps towards building Google.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 09:57:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Camping Holidays! - Focal Pix Wedding Photography, Hampshire, UK</title><link>http://www.focalpix.co.uk/weddings/blog.php?postid=26&amp;title=Camping+Holidays%21#comment-925758</link><description>That sounds fun!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:49:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 mistakes new web developers often make</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/06/29/5-mistakes-new-web-developers-often-make/#comment-789977</link><description>Thanks!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:50:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 mistakes new web developers often make</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/06/29/5-mistakes-new-web-developers-often-make/#comment-782347</link><description>Edited to fix that... good thinking!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:40:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 mistakes new web developers often make</title><link>http://www.bradshawenterprises.com/blog/2008/06/29/5-mistakes-new-web-developers-often-make/#comment-773879</link><description>Yeah - if you allow arbitrary code to run on your server, it's not your server anymore...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:17:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Really Using FriendFeed, or are You a Poser?</title><link>http://www.scribkin.com/2008/06/27/are-you-really-using-friendfeed-or-are-you-a-poser/#comment-764339</link><description>Does it really matter? Is your issue that these people ar just using FriendFeed to promote themselves without interacting personally?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I guess that if the comment fragmentation problem ever gets "solved" then this sort of thing won't happen any more as a comment here will be a comment there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 15:09:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: RSSmeme Creator Served With Legal Threat Over RSS Sharing</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/06/rssmeme-creator-served-with-legal.html#comment-715640</link><description>If you don't want content syndicated, don't offer an RSS feed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Surely it's that straightforward!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:12:22 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>