<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for richbradshaw</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/richbradshaw/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:57 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Grooms men getting ready....</title><link>http://focalpix.disqus.com/grooms_men_getting_ready/#comment-16103121</link><description>Timor looks good doesn't he!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 14:07:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The highest traffic site in the world doesn&amp;#8217;t close its HTML tags</title><link>http://buggd.disqus.com/the_highest_traffic_site_in_the_world_doesn8217t_close_its_html_tags_39/#comment-11848355</link><description>If you gzip your code, then this makes such a tiny difference that it's essentially pointless.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you don't gzip it, then you should.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 04:10:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/how_to_use_twitter_as_an_error_log/#comment-7478174</link><description>I'm only using it for mission critical errors, so hopefully!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:49:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/how_to_use_twitter_as_an_error_log/#comment-7478147</link><description>There is another API method for directs, though I found it worked fine using a d .</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:48:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Chocolate Fountain Heaven!</title><link>http://focalpix.disqus.com/chocolate_fountain_heaven/#comment-7451008</link><description>Always fancied having one of these at home...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:14:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to use Twitter as an error log</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/how_to_use_twitter_as_an_error_log/#comment-7285035</link><description>Yeah - you'd want the twitter account to be private for good reason. Been using this for a few days now, and it's really good - going to set it up as a matter of course from now on.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 09:43:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Windows 7 &amp;ndash; The agony and the glory</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/windows_7_ndash_the_agony_and_the_glory/#comment-5044294</link><description>How much disk space does it take when installed?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:44:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Macbook Air v. Netbooks</title><link>http://deasil.disqus.com/on_macbook_air_v_netbooks/#comment-4981423</link><description>Interestingly, a teacher friend of mine is actually looking at using an ipod touch for presentations in class, so she doesn't have to take her Thinkpad back and forth al the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rbarooah</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:25:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: On Macbook Air v. Netbooks</title><link>http://deasil.disqus.com/on_macbook_air_v_netbooks/#comment-4966937</link><description>See, I disagree. I have two 1st gen EEE pcs, and use them constantly. I'm a teacher, so I use it at work for all presenting in lessons etc as well as casual surfing at home. I've had them both quite a few months now and am glad I have them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the other hand, I do regularly use them through external monitors for longer stretches. Right now it's through my 32" TV, which admittedly does help!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:45:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DISQUS and Facebook Connect under the mistletoe</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_and_facebook_connect_under_the_mistletoe/#comment-4437901</link><description>Website owners add these API keys. As a commenter, you just need to be logged into Facebook.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">danielha</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 17:45:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DISQUS and Facebook Connect under the mistletoe</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_and_facebook_connect_under_the_mistletoe/#comment-4436702</link><description>Yes, for now. We are working with Facebook to come up with more convenient options in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrew</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:51:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DISQUS and Facebook Connect under the mistletoe</title><link>http://disqus.disqus.com/disqus_and_facebook_connect_under_the_mistletoe/#comment-4434794</link><description>Do you need a seperate API key for every site you want to use?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:32:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just saying BANG! could kill them</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/just_saying_bang_could_kill_them/#comment-3646653</link><description>opps ... sorry about that I'll be more careful in the future :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">StevenHodson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 13:59:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Just saying BANG! could kill them</title><link>http://inquisitr.disqus.com/just_saying_bang_could_kill_them/#comment-3644999</link><description>I'm thinking that if they read this story that the bang in capital might prove fatal.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:56:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jane's Tumblr</title><link>http://janestumblr.disqus.com/janes_tumblr_9641/#comment-3644765</link><description>lol</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2008 11:26:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google 2001 is So Cool!</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/google_2001_is_so_cool/#comment-2777547</link><description>I love it! No Scoble :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">loiclemeur</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:26:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google 2001 is So Cool!</title><link>http://loiclemeur.disqus.com/google_2001_is_so_cool/#comment-2775407</link><description>I'm going to start modifying peoples search boxes to search this instead of the usual google...</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 09:03:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 ways to make using bash more productive</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/5_ways_to_make_using_bash_more_productive/#comment-2659556</link><description>Thanks - good to know I'm helping people out!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 14:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Writing dynamic XML sitemaps using PHP</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/writing_dynamic_xml_sitemaps_using_php/#comment-2521968</link><description>Good point - that's how I have it set up on my sites - probably should have mentioned that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some sites automatically guess that it should be at /sitemap.xml, so I'd recommend doing this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 22 Sep 2008 13:08:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/google_chrome_memory_usage/#comment-2431090</link><description>That's how it's designed, each tab and plugin gets it's own process. That way, if one crashes it won't crash the whole browser.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Read this for more details: &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_04.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.google.com/googlebooks/chrome/small_...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 15:19:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Benchmarking Chrome&amp;#8217;s V8 Javascript engine</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/benchmarking_chrome8217s_v8_javascript_engine/#comment-2180859</link><description>No, I was surprised too, and have run them with various different combinations. FF 3.1 has both the JIT options in about:config set to true and I restarted the machine. On these benchmarks it actually performs slightly slower than when they are set to false...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Weird - I'm going to update to the newest nightly today and try again, these benchmarks are with yesterdays nightly build.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 03:09:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/google_chrome_memory_usage/#comment-2145716</link><description>Remember that this is just on first boot, and doesn't simulate browsing at all.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Flash takes up a huge amount of memory, as does Adobe Acrobat - both use about 3 times as much as Chrome it seems, so they might be the culprits.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:44:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/google_chrome_memory_usage/#comment-2138243</link><description>Yes...its QUICK...!&lt;br&gt;But...even though it´s according to these information using little memory...somehow with CHROM running my memory usage climbs up. I tried to find the reason and could not find the source...&lt;br&gt;User Interface: GREAT!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Martin Scheele</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:25:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Chrome Memory Usage</title><link>http://bradshawenterprises.disqus.com/google_chrome_memory_usage/#comment-2018111</link><description>Yeah, it's quick isn't it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">richbradshaw</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:02:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Camping Holidays! - Focal Pix Wedding Photography, Hampshire, UK</title><link>http://focalpix.disqus.com/camping_holidays_focal_pix_wedding_photography_hampshire_uk/#comment-981348</link><description>Can't wait!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">focalpix</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 17:21:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>