<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rizzn</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-2141a639" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/rizzn/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:31:45 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/this-is-intervention-robert.php#comment-2222996</link><description>Were you really?  I'm trying to get to the bottom of an issue you have with&lt;br&gt;us, and instead of responding seriously, you throw poor excuses for jokes.&lt;br&gt;Would you have all the companies in DEMO take down their websites and issue&lt;br&gt;DMCA notices to whomever has written about them in the past until 7AM&lt;br&gt;tomorrow?  Get real. Quit covering for the fact that you didn't actually&lt;br&gt;look at these websites, as you claim. Otherwise you never would have said&lt;br&gt;the things you said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This isn't a press release reprint.  Again, back up your claim - if it's a&lt;br&gt;press release, show me the original.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What it is - and you know this because you're not as big of a moron as&lt;br&gt;you're pretending to be - is an announcement of future coverage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's more expedient for you to pretend to be a moron, though.  Thing is, you&lt;br&gt;keep it up and people will start to believe that it isn't an act anymore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:31:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/this-is-intervention-robert.php#comment-2222990</link><description>I didn't lower myself to the gutter, so much as defend myself and point out&lt;br&gt;what it is your doing and what your motivations are. It's one thing when&lt;br&gt;people make accusations in private, and we can discuss and straighten things&lt;br&gt;out in private.  You shot your mouth off in full view, and then ran out to&lt;br&gt;FriendFeed to repeat your accusations, and had at least 30 or so comments&lt;br&gt;come along behind you and say "mee too! whatever Robert just said!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's called "brand management," and you're just being intentionally obtuse&lt;br&gt;at this point. If someone's going around badmouthing your company and your&lt;br&gt;work, you don't just ignore it, you address it. Why are you here running&lt;br&gt;your mouth off here and digging yourself a deeper hole? If I'm wrong,&lt;br&gt;shouldn't you be either proving otherwise or ignoring me?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The thing is, I have a voice and people listen to what I say, same as you.&lt;br&gt;What is most puzzling to me and others reading this is why you continue to&lt;br&gt;sling dirt and obfuscate the issue rather than back up your claims with any&lt;br&gt;sort of fact.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:31:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/this-is-intervention-robert.php#comment-2218094</link><description>I'm a nice guy, but I can also be a defensive guy when I see people attacked without reason (including my co-workers). As I said in the video, I really used to enjoy Robert's presence in the blogosphere, since he's usually such an easy and willing foil. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for hanging out.  The journalism post is currently scheduled to go out Monday. Hopefully all the final touches will be ready by then. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:55:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/this-is-intervention-robert.php#comment-2217927</link><description>If you looked at the sites at all, Robert, these videos were listed freely available on the PlasticLogic website.  If you'd looked at the websites like you said you did, you would have seen the link to the publicly available videos.  Is that sort of like, say, not doing your research and writing something up without any actual knowledge of the product?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Look, I can't speak for every writer at Mashable (they can speak for themselves and many did so in the comments on the original article)... when it comes to a review, we use the service. When it comes a funding announcement or an unreleased feature announcement - sure - we write off the press release.  It's not something you can do much about. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's pretty difficult to take a funding announcement out for a spin before you write it up. That still doesn't mean we're simply re-writing a press release, though.  We also analyze how the funding announcment will impact the business, the sector and the industry if possible.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We insert analysis of some kind into every post we do. For you to belittle it as simply "re-writing a press release" is still insulting. It still is demeaning to what we do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:41:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/piper-palin-patooie-rnc08.php#comment-2112829</link><description>That's odd - it's playing for me.  You might try clicking the link below the embed and watching it directly on UStream's site.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:12:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Google Chrome Browser - All Of The Best Video Clips To Learn Everything About It</title><link>http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2008/09/03/the_new_google_chrome_browser_all/index.htm#comment-2060962</link><description>Hah! Good work then. Kudos on taking the time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 21:13:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Google Chrome Browser - All Of The Best Video Clips To Learn Everything About It</title><link>http://www.masternewmedia.org/news/2008/09/03/the_new_google_chrome_browser_all/index.htm#comment-2034416</link><description>Very cool - did you take the time to tap out the transcripts, or is it from some voice recog software you're using?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 19:50:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-is-my-new-default-browser.php#comment-2026825</link><description>No problemo. :-).&lt;br&gt;I'm not doom and gloom all the time, and as a few on FriendFeed noted this&lt;br&gt;evening, I even admit it when I'm wrong from time to time.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:07:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-is-my-new-default-browser.php#comment-2025841</link><description>Noted.&lt;br&gt;Now I'm curious as to why Lively never worked for me.  I don't run&lt;br&gt;ZoneAlarm.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 03:12:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/google-chrome-is-my-new-default-browser.php#comment-2020460</link><description>That's the same error I got when I tried to install Lively. I never found a workaround for it, but didn't experience the error with Chrome.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 23:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/worst-browser-in-world.php#comment-2002685</link><description>FF gives me good days and bad days.  Keep in mind that I'm on a computer almost 24/7, so I put a browser thru it's paces.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some days I just long for the old Web 1.0 era.  Browsers seemed much stabler back then, but perhaps that's just my memory rosifying up the truth that things were about the same then as now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:46:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/worst-browser-in-world.php#comment-2002673</link><description>From those I've talked to, the problem spans platform, too.  Kristen and Alana both experienced this issue on their powerbooks over at Mashable.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 10:45:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/5-friggin-fantastic-blogs.php#comment-2001055</link><description>Hah! I highly doubt that'll happen. (not that I doubt we'll meet some day, I doubt the other thing about not being able to stand you...).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;:-p</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:33:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/09/5-friggin-fantastic-blogs.php#comment-2001054</link><description>I don't have plans to come down, but if you get an alternative party going, I'm sure I could probably twist my wife's arm to head down there with me.  I'll ask her tomorrow. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 09:32:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/new-kind-of-journalism-1-primer.php#comment-1931150</link><description>No worries. More readers the better.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:38:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/new-kind-of-journalism-1-primer.php#comment-1926108</link><description>Years ago I tried to venture into that world - it's pretty insular and difficult for an outsider like me to figure out.  If you have any experience in that world, I'd me more than happy for some guideposts or any help.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:56:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/new-kind-of-journalism-1-primer.php#comment-1926103</link><description>Now that I think of it, though, I might start posting these in much smaller chunks.  Either most of you are still trying to digest all of this, or the majority of you simply skipped it.  Not sure which. Thoughts?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:55:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/new-kind-of-journalism-1-primer.php#comment-1926089</link><description>Thanks. I'm glad you liked it.  I'm a lecturer / public speaker at heart, so I imagined what I'd need to say to lay the foundation for the advanced concepts I wanted to tackle in the branches and went from there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:48:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/new-kind-of-journalism-1-primer.php#comment-1926086</link><description>You're right, I think this is generally targeted to folks who are interested in the industry but not working on it from the inside. I wanted to explain the concepts and themes foundationally here so that I could refer back to them in future posts (or, if it ever gets to that point, chapters - who knows, dream big).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Not to mention, I guess, that writing for Mashable has sorta trained me to not do the shorthand thing as much. Increasingly, we're writing over there for wider audiences who don't necessarily know all the jargon and ins and outs of everything.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You're right, though. For those of us in the know, I coulda basically said "the conversation is the blog is the news" and built from there.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:46:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/seth-godin-automation-is-bad-dont-do-it.php#comment-1881363</link><description>Indeed... I'm just covering my basis. :-p&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;FWIW, I definitely agree with you on your points - these are poor implementations of technology, and as a technologist, I felt it necessary to speak up for my (as of current, anyway) less than sentient friends.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The "bots", as it were, still need humans who know how to use the right tool for the right job and then configure it properly. Using these tools, I think a much more personal, transparent, and expedient approach can be taken to most things.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end, a net win for everyone.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 01:29:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/seth-godin-automation-is-bad-dont-do-it.php#comment-1877422</link><description>Heh - I thought you might like this one. As you know, I welcome our new robot overlords, and look forward to their *kind and benevolent* rule. You hear that, Googlebot? Kind and benevolent!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 20:29:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: In a polarized society, will moderate viewpoints die?</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/2675/in-a-polarized-society-will-moderate-viewpoints-die/#comment-1865900</link><description>Spot on with a lot of what you're saying here, and your comments on Old v. New Media resonate with me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Our terminology (like in many things in our corner of tech) continues to get muddled, and it's hard to distinguish the method vs the organizational type, and which one will die, how and why.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 09:05:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/i-have-helmet-that-goes-with-title.php#comment-1865736</link><description>I appreciate your comments - amongst the nicest I've received all day. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's pretty par for the course there at Mashable for the "haterz" to come out and play.  A lot of my friends and folks who used to comment on all of my articles have actually been staying away, though I'm not sure if the two things are related. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Incidentally, if you have the time to spend, there's also a strong showing of Alex Jones fans starting to filter into the comments, too. One of them actually uses the phrase "we're in the woodwork," another bit of linguistic acrobatics that's almost worth wading through the junk to find.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/digital-bill-of-rights-are-you-kidding.php#comment-1858611</link><description>Well, if you mean this post, probably not, since I'm not an important enough blogger to be listed there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you mean the others I mentioned above, I don't think they ever really come in conjunction with one another, so it never really attracted enough attention to get a headline.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 22:23:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: rizzn's personal blog</title><link>http://rizzn.com/blog/2008/08/digital-bill-of-rights-are-you-kidding.php#comment-1857677</link><description>There are tons of folks who covered this territory much better.  EFF, Wired, TechDirt, TLF, just to name a few.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rizzn</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:58:21 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>