<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for rtwomey</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-2e7abf82" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/rtwomey/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:46:06 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Thoughts on Google and Apple's Earnings</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2009/01/thoughts-on-google-and-apples-earnings.html#comment-5494294</link><description>What would make you feel more comfortable with Apple?  At what point would such compelling fundamentals make it possible to overlook things like their management transparency track record, or are you out no matter what?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:46:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: CBS Is Quietly Building An Internet Radio Powerhouse</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/12/cbs-is-quietly.html#comment-4148098</link><description>It will definitely be interesting to watch.  I liken this to the Internet video industry: it wasn't until YouTube proved that online video could be a commercial enterprise did the media companies become interested in working with the trend (Hulu) instead of against it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'd bet that the success of streaming radio via Yahoo and AOL (and Pandora and Last.fm) has shown the media companies that it's possible to work with this audio trend rather than against it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 11:27:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: There Are Two Phones In this World: iPhone and Not iPhone</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/12/there-are-two-phones-in-this-world.html#comment-4133181</link><description>I'd still recommend it. Text messages are very easy to use, and I especially like seeing it in the iChat-like interface.  For web connectivity, you can't find a better device: Safari on the iPhone is excellent.  And you'll probably like the apps.  There's a lot out there and I'm sure you'll find one that's helpful.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 15:24:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Example of Good PR</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/11/example-of-good.html#comment-4029561</link><description>Terrible pitch.  Aside from the complete nonsequitor of Wired, I have no idea what they're talking about.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 15:49:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Calculate How Much Spam Costs You</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/9035/calculate-how-much-spam-costs-you/#comment-3984751</link><description>I'm not too annoyed by the marketing pitch.  Really, I prefer things like this over advertisements: it proves to you why you should consider their service using your own data.  If we had fewer banner ads and more things like this, people could judge for themselves what products to purchase on a far more even level.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:16:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple releases iPhone 2.2 update, it&amp;#8217;s a big one</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/11/20/apple-releases-iphone-22-update-its-a-big-one/#comment-3984633</link><description>I've been using the update over the weekend, and I'm certainly impressed.  The iPhone is getting progressively better, but I wonder about Apple's priorities.  For instance, street view is a nice feature (and they implemented it beautifully), but I think there are other, more pressing priorities they could have worked on instead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For one, the maps feature is *so close* to being great for in-car navigation.  All it would need is improved recognition of where you are on your route.  Throw in turn-by-turn directions and route-recalculation and you've got a full-blown GPS device right there.  I see no limitations with the hardware that would prevent this, only that it must not be a very high priority for Apple.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;So how does Apple decide priorities?  GPS devices have been fantastic holiday sellers.  If Apple implemented these features in the iPhone, couldn't they make the marketing case to consider the iPhone as a gift instead of a GPS device?  Seems like that might further help holiday sales.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 10:05:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to calculate cost-per-acquisition for startups relying on freemium, subscription, or virtual items biz models</title><link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/11/17/how-to-calculate-cost-per-acquisition-for-startups-relying-on-freemium-subscription-or-virtual-items-biz-models/#comment-3867484</link><description>Great overview.  I typically focus on two critical parts of this for my freemium service: breadth and conversion ratio.  I first ensure that we have a steady flow of new users coming to our service and registering for the free account, then I make sure I'm spending enough time getting our conversion ratio as high as possible.  It's death if either of these sides of the equation get out of balance.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I've found that getting people to sign up for a free account is often the easy part: convincing enough people to sign up for the paid version is where the real work lies.  :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:51:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Usability presentation for iPhone apps and store</title><link>http://andrewchenblog.com/2008/11/10/usability-presentation-for-iphone-apps-and-store/#comment-3663338</link><description>Very interesting research.  I'm especially intrigued about the results of the App Store behaviors.  Most of what I saw confirmed my own suspicions, but it's reassuring to see people taking reviews "with a grain of salt".  A lot of developers (myself included) have felt that the reviews on an app can make or break it with new users, but if people really are skeptical, then there may be some hope.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:39:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does a Web Office hurt Google or MSFT?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/does-a-web-office-hurt-google-or-msft/#comment-3363667</link><description>I certainly agree with you on that.  I think people that promote Google Docs as an Office killer aren't quite understanding what Google Docs is all about (and what it isn't).  It's excellent for collaboration, and I use it regularly with people at work.  However, it's definitely NOT an Office replacement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Microsoft realizes this, and I think that's why having an online presence to compete with Google Docs will hurt Google far more than cannibalize any Office sales.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 11:31:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Does a Web Office hurt Google or MSFT?</title><link>http://www.mathewingram.com/work/2008/10/28/does-a-web-office-hurt-google-or-msft/#comment-3361716</link><description>Another possibility could be that this further extends the Office dominance in business, and slows down the adoption of Google Docs.  Many businesses purchase Office for the desktop as a necessary cost of doing business: they're not interested in jumping through hoops to save a few bucks (Open Office has only a fraction of Office users).  Extending that idea, I don't think Google Docs could be a replacement for Office anyway, as these mainstream users just aren't interested in switching.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Therefor, I think by giving users additional options for using their existing Office installation will only further solidify Office dominance and continue to give users just enough reason not to switch.  So I see it hurting Google far more than it could ever hurt MSFT.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 09:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How Apple Can Support True Background Applications on the iPhone</title><link>http://www.dracoware.com/blog/2008/10/24/how-apple-can-support-true-background-applications-on-the-iphone/#comment-3281785</link><description>I agree, but what if you just limited it to one app at a time?  Basically, you'd restrict the user to only have 1 foreground and 1 background app running at any time.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I worry that if you use the slicing approach (which is perfectly fine in that case), you would find yourself getting into task manager territory.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:13:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey - ActiveMerchant is about as easy as it gets</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/39857409#comment-773898</link><description>You bet.  I'm still working through my implementation now, so there's still some work to be done.  Incidentally, I used your Peepcode book as an introduction to getting started, which was a very helpful guide.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 10:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/35060155#comment-486240</link><description>haha, thanks.  I'm using it too, and I'm impressed.  It's a nice eye-candy way of viewing feeds, though it's not really meant for hardcore RSS addicts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I'm doing, actually, is pulling together lots of feeds that aren't in my regular newsreader and using snackr to display them.  That way, whenever I glance over at it, I'm guaranteed to see something I haven't already read, and can pick out things I may not have seen otherwise.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:51:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ryan Twomey - A busy day...</title><link>http://ryantwomey.com/post/35174986#comment-486217</link><description>Thanks.  Luckily, the rain has been holding off.  Hopefully it stays that way, otherwise it will be a miserable day.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rtwomey</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:41:38 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>