<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for shareme</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-d2e873b5" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/shareme/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:10:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sometimes You Just Have To Walk Away</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/sometimes-you-j.html#comment-1823775</link><description>Maybe I am miss understanding th detail. I was sure PG stated that out of 104 companies only less than 5 were write offs or did I get that detail wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:10:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/ubuntu_intrepid_alpha4_in_4#comment-1486291</link><description>Yes, I agree and also notice they are fast becoming an Enterprise solution as well. And they give Debian a good name by having standard release cycles.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 22:56:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Venture Fund Economics: When One Deal Returns The Fund</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/venture-fund--2.html#comment-1110431</link><description>Thus, could than one look at a slowing economy as the Sieve that forces start-ups to reconstruct their venture into one that fits your VC fund strategy?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 11:22:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Lazy and Smarter Web</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/the-lazy-and-sm.html#comment-1074931</link><description>Sorry, I should have explained you are one of the people I know who that picks their crowds so that crowd sourcing is somewhat effective&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Than of course there is the indirect choice of someone following you because of a comment on FF which also produces similar dynamic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am curious of what produces the more reliable info the direct choice or the indirect crowd choice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 20:12:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Lazy and Smarter Web</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/08/the-lazy-and-sm.html#comment-1074465</link><description>I think are confusing crowd sourcing of one's picks with crowd sourcing the unwashed masses. in one you get intelligent answers in the other not so very much. The crowd yo depend upon is only as intelligent as you were to pick them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:25:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Globalization: Some Numbers</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/globalization-s.html#comment-955980</link><description>With two monopoly locks both Apple ansd the Mobile Carrier its not a very worhwhile opportunity and that was Fred Wilson's implied point in his answer to me..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 14:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Globalization: Some Numbers</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/globalization-s.html#comment-954702</link><description>I am working on an idea:)  First phase fully self funded..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Globalization: Some Numbers</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/globalization-s.html#comment-954586</link><description>The two first trends change how a mobile start up might work. it use to be you specialized in Symbian C+, J2me and etc to build a platform.  However, now with the the two first trends you adopt an Apple iPhone strategy whereas the web on mobile is the platform you code to with just ajax, html, css, and etc and hook it server side wise so that you can adopt fast to the market changes and thus get apps out fast. The start up can boot strap in using the Facebook platform as the user cloud computing platform and thus already have a market channel infrastructure and thus by-pass the mobile telecoms.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 10:31:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The New Facebook will actually come as a surprise</title><link>http://www.inquisitr.com/1826/the-new-facebook-will-actually-come-as-a-surprise/#comment-953431</link><description>They are moving towards the it/enterprise way fo seeing a platform and apps relationship which means more serious apps ahead for users.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 04:01:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/an_ant_question#comment-857028</link><description>That is what I thought. Thanks for the FYI</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:19:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Happy Birthday America</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/07/happy-birthday.html#comment-815030</link><description>I am reminded of another one that occurred around Paris, France..after WWI the establishment of the American Legion..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 18:55:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/upgrade_to_2_6_24#comment-774992</link><description>after installing .19 kernel minor version delete .16 minor version short term hit esc during boot sequence and choose other kernel version to boto into</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 29 Jun 2008 20:33:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/eclipse3_4_equinox_it_is#comment-717039</link><description>I think you mistake swearing at frustrations for something else sir...and quite frankly interjecting Equinox p2 so late within the development cycle did not help..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 18:37:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/eclipse3_4_equinox_it_is#comment-714064</link><description>Sir, some evidence of your point?  I mean do you have one some where to point out?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 12:46:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Icahn haz blog. Loves the word &amp;#8220;absurd&amp;#8221;</title><link>http://venturebeat.com/2008/06/19/icahn-haz-blog-loves-the-word-absurd/#comment-711615</link><description>The only power was the Yahoo people walking out the door..if we are lucky a whole bunch of VCs are recruiting those individuals right now to start new start ups which have a positive impact on our high tech economy...Icahn's blow hard tactics will not..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 01:27:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techmeme and "Blogging 2.0"</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/techmeme-and-bl.html#comment-630528</link><description>How about the  term Conversation Conflagration 2.0?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I already see the same pattern I am reading more twitter posts via web interface and FriendFeed  and Disqus threads than the usual tech blogs and etc..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;BTw, good taste in music..you should get the live tapes when he plays with Steve Dahl of Chicago..:) &lt;a href="http://dahl.com"&gt;dahl.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 16:43:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elevator Pitches</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/elevator-pitche.html#comment-597910</link><description>I go tot thinking about the MySQL architecture hints that were in the twitter interviews and how to reduce infinite queries and came up with using a search infrastructure to reduce those infinite queries..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My other idea was to use datastore apis like Apache CouchDB but that would still not get rid of the problem of finite queries only delay it..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 12:48:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elevator Pitches</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/elevator-pitche.html#comment-597581</link><description>Elevator pitch to fix twitter:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Treat the &lt;a href="http://twitter.com/home"&gt;http://twitter.com/home&lt;/a&gt; as the same as search index result architecture wise with ful search engine architecture. Might be a way to bring back tack.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 11:21:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-571329</link><description>It would seem that something like the Jabber XMPP protocol becomes a DMZ transport in this area to integrate different clouds together to achieve this valued sharing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Fro example, you could use to bridge sharing form desktop to mobile as in what Twitter had in Track to mobile client.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:20:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-571291</link><description>Value of sharing is the non-commodity here.. ie the conversation and the tools that enable  that immediate conversation</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:11:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My Vision For Social Media</title><link>http://www.avc.com/a_vc/2008/06/my-vision-for-s.html#comment-571288</link><description>Sir, it  is not life sharing as we will have a range form those who share all to those who share little bits. It is the conversation that is enabled with new tools around that sharing that is not the commodity and is valuable. Fro example, when titter goes down its not the sharing we miss as he have other such as Jaiku, its the conversation enabled by twitter's functionality that we miss and want back up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ah-ha moment is already occurring in discussions n GillmorGang discussion  and etc. Fred, you are missing out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 12:09:35 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/some_equinox_pictures#comment-542710</link><description>Right, but normally once its installed and  uncheck the show installed items than they should is appear as they have before, right?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:52:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/some_equinox_pictures#comment-542684</link><description>Yes, in fact will be adding to that bug report tonight..&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Is the picture  comparison helping as far as understanding that there  problems?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 16:46:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR secrets? bullshit.</title><link>http://www.loiclemeur.com/english/2008/05/pr-secrets-bull.html#comment-530301</link><description>These are the exact PR points I wanted a Start Up CEO/Original Founder in Chicago to get if that you worry and strive to get the best quality possible of the prototype and product and become spokes person for that process both to inside the company and outside the company you than have your ful pr/marketing strategies already developed into effective actions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Unfortunately, the Chicago Start UP Founder I was conversing with is somewhat bull-headed in the illogical way and irrational way.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I look forward to using this post to being a new conversation with a new start up as this post ranks up with the Paul Graham Start Up essays in  importance and value to every Start Up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 May 2008 13:57:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ShareMe -The Mobile Future : Weblog</title><link>http://www.jroller.com/shareme/entry/migrating_from_old_eclipse_habits#comment-528423</link><description>Ed Merks and everyone sorry for the delay..I will probably try again to reproduce the error on Monday or Tuesday so I can post logs attached to a bugzilla report..  I can say my current Eclipse 3.4RC1 is extremely stable..I too want people to feel comfortable with the new Update Manager its a major part of why I wanted to start using RC versions.. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Once again, I do appreciate the had work everyone has completed on the Equinox P2 Updater thus far.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shareme</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:17:08 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>