<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of shawnfarner</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/shawnfarner/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22256194</link><description>Awesome points. Congrats on building the best Twitter app on the Android platform, by the way. I'll keep with it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:36:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22255508</link><description>When we play the YouTube videos (same video, same UI) the ones on the Palm Pre, the HTC Touch, the iPhone are much higher resolution than the ones that play on the Droid. Yes, they are NOT "true HD" but they are very sharp and very good looking. Not on the Droid. They look like ass on the Droid.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:15:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22255207</link><description>This is a major reason why I bought one. I think Apple needs competition. That's healthy for all of us. So, totally agree with you on that point.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:04:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254886</link><description>Hah, I don't like Wave so I've been ignoring that. But I think you are right on. Google is making big plays to stick its foot into enterprises. Microsoft better watch out here.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:52:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254830</link><description>It's not quite that simple, though. Google has a better platform-building team and approach. This is why Android has come in late into the market and already gotten more than 10,000 apps built for it (something that Microsoft, Nokia, Palm and others have failed to do, by the way). The platform eventually wins. Or at least that's been true so far. That beautiful Mac? It was cloned "enough" by Microsoft and Microsoft's superior platform approach led it to 90% marketshare. Being beautiful and usable is NOT enough!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:50:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254704</link><description>That said, my new Toyota Prius has a very good GPS system, so I don't need turn-by-turn the way other people might.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:45:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254689</link><description>Ahh, yes, I just forgot about that. We talked about Google's Maps in the podcast. I'll add that as another good thing about Droid (turn-by-turn directions and street-level views rock on the Droid).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:44:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254154</link><description>Mark: yes. That's why I feel Android is Windows 3.1. It's ugly. But you can see the future is going to be very bright. Developers ARE supporting Android in a big way. It's their second platform, I've been interviewing a ton of them.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:42:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254045</link><description>Another good point I should have made in my article. No, the Droid can't do simultaneous voice and data (I believe this is due to the EVDO network that Verizon uses). Good points about getting service in rural areas. I don't use a phone in rural areas very often.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:38:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22254003</link><description>I'll switch my iPhone over to Verizon too if it goes. The network is noticeably better in Half Moon Bay. Ironic, too, because I know of a major Apple exec who lives just down the road from me.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:36:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253946</link><description>As to Symbian, that OS is not up to the standards of Android. But Symbian will be the market share winner for a long time (Nokia sells a ton of single-chip phones to emerging markets that don't even know what a web browser is).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:35:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253925</link><description>Weird, on Facebook (the Web page, not the app) the double-click on photo thing wasn't working for some reason. Very frustrating. The zoom control did work, though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:34:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253874</link><description>I don't think Android will pass iPhone unless something spectacular happens next year and I don't think it will. Everyone in China says Apple has locked up the best supply chain, so building a better device than Apple isn't in the cards. That said, I'd expect Android to grow faster percentage wise than Apple next year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:32:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253683</link><description>I live in a small town with 14,000 people. Here Verizon is a LOT better than AT&amp;T.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:25:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253658</link><description>These are good reasons to stay! Thanks, I was hoping I'd find more of them because I sure feel like returning this and know I need to keep it to stay up-to-date on Android.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:24:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253612</link><description>Ryan: wrong question. Because if market share mattered we'd all be on Nokia.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:22:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253485</link><description>Oh, absolutely! Even Apple fans who would never consider switching have to love the competition. Why? It will force Apple to get better. The screen on the Droid really shows that Apple needs a push. Wow is that thing beautiful!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:18:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Droid fails AS A PRODUCT when compared to Palm Pre and iPhone</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/08/droid-palm-pre-iphone-product-comparison/#comment-22253386</link><description>I think you hit on something. Even my salesguy admitted that the Droid has him thinking of replacing his Blackberry. The Blackberry UI is so ugly and dated that the Droid will probably win with people like that who feel they MUST have a physical keyboard. The Droid is definitely a better experience than Blackberry already. It's just that I have an iPhone and my friend has a Palm Pre and it doesn't measure up to those two.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:14:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Services Need to Stop With the Twitter Kool-Aid</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2009/11/03/services-need-to-stop-with-the-twitter-kool-aid/#comment-21773013</link><description>Paying customers know how to get support via more traditional channels. But, remember, most of our customers are hard-core geeks and Twitter is the fastest way to interact with a large group of geeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Services Need to Stop With the Twitter Kool-Aid</title><link>http://staynalive.com/articles/2009/11/03/services-need-to-stop-with-the-twitter-kool-aid/#comment-21772946</link><description>Email is fine, but lots of them get sent to junk mail folders and will be missed. Why is Twitter so paid attention to? Because it's public. Answer a question once and it is answered for everyone. Most people who don't like Twitter know to use our blog or our chat support or, even, gasp to use the old-school telephone (a real human will answer your call 24 hours a day at Rackspace).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 13:24:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I switch services so often (why I don&amp;#8217;t use Google Reader anymore)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/31/why-i-switch-services/#comment-21731004</link><description>Andrea: I've actually found I like Twitter better because there's more brands and more news flowing through it. And, anyway, everytime I look at my RSS reader I see stuff that is mostly already on Twitter or on TechMeme. The stuff that's left isn't really all that interesting and if it were, it would get shoved to me by my 12,000 friends I'm listening to now on Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:09:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why I switch services so often (why I don&amp;#8217;t use Google Reader anymore)</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/10/31/why-i-switch-services/#comment-21730630</link><description>It's not incredibly silly. I have that many friends on Foursquare. I have 10x that many on Twitter. I have 10x that many on Facebook. 10x that many on FriendFeed. Just because I don't use the tool in the same way you do doesn't mean it's incredibly silly. If it were so silly, why do they let you add more than, say, 100 friends?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:58:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techmeme vs. Twitter lists?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/techmeme-vs-twitter-lists/#comment-21729737</link><description>And, again, Twitter is changing to be "RSS lite." Only it's a lot better and the feeds are easier to find and easier, for most people, to use than RSS. Look at my news feed. But if you are only following a handful of feeds and it works for you, wonderful. It just isn't working for me anymore.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:31:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techmeme vs. Twitter lists?</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/techmeme-vs-twitter-lists/#comment-21729669</link><description>I do a favorites list over at &lt;a href="http://www.twitter.com/scobleizer/favorites" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.twitter.com/scobleizer/favorites&lt;/a&gt; -- that's where the value is. But there IS value of having all this news aggregated together in one place.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 23:29:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Louis Gray&amp;#8217;s &amp;#8220;five stages of early adopterism&amp;#8221; chart</title><link>http://scobleizer.com/2009/11/02/louis-grays-five-stages-of-early-adopterism-chart/#comment-21720633</link><description>Yes. Actually on Friday I had a talk with NK, who wrote the object database underneath these new features and the new list features and I'm even more excited now.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scobleizer</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 20:54:39 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>