<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for skiermm89</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/skiermm89/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:19:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Black Hats in the Ivory Tower? Unlikely.</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/black_hats_in_the_ivory_tower_unlikely_89/#comment-1118277</link><description>It's all about the matter in which they go about vulnerability communication and escalation. That's what draws the line between the security researcher and hackers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the big picture, the responsibility falls onto the corporation to monitor all facets of vulnerability sources. Security through obscurity should never be a strategic posture.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 21:19:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security in Beijing</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/security_in_beijing/#comment-1117185</link><description>Another side note: US Secretary of Commerce Carlos M. Gutierrez left a laptop unattended for a few minutes last December, and it's being investigated as to whether it was cloned as well.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trim17</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:59:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Black Hats in the Ivory Tower? Unlikely.</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/black_hats_in_the_ivory_tower_unlikely_89/#comment-1117151</link><description>Hat color.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Joking aside, there really is no difference other than intent. And disclosure. At least how I see it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You raise an excellent dilemma in the security world. What is the difference between a security firm contracted to audit Germany's biometric passport system, and the hackers from the Chaos Computer Club proving it insecure for free? (cf. &lt;a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/30/german_interior_minister_fingerprint_appropriated/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/03/30/german_...&lt;/a&gt;) Why pay for a &lt;br&gt;"security tool" when hackers release such excellent cracks and tools for free? (&lt;a href="http://insecure.org" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://insecure.org&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Undoubtedly there are very professional security researchers at the highest levels of business, government, and academia and producing excellent work. Equally true is that many vulnerabilities and exploits are still found by amateur hackers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">trim17</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 18:55:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Black Hats in the Ivory Tower? Unlikely.</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/black_hats_in_the_ivory_tower_unlikely_89/#comment-1106756</link><description>What's the difference between a Hacker and a Security Researcher?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:36:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Security in Beijing</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/security_in_beijing/#comment-1106703</link><description>Foreign citizens traveling to the Beijing Olympics should definitely be aware of this heightened level of “security." On top of video surveillance, China is ordering hotels to install network monitoring devices. I advise anyone to traveling to the Olympics to leave any laptop (and smart phone) that contains confidential information at home, or expect to share it with nationalist hackers and Chinese government.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On a side note: A top UK aide was social engineered last year after being picked up by at a disco party. His Blackberry was missing the next morning. They most likely cloned it. I don't Gordon Brown was too happy with him when he found out.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 19:29:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techies&amp;#8217; Top 20 Apps and Websites</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/techies8217_top_20_apps_and_websites/#comment-442884</link><description>Outlook is not open-source. Switch to Thunderbird.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daehee</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:48:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Techies&amp;#8217; Top 20 Apps and Websites</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/techies8217_top_20_apps_and_websites/#comment-442497</link><description>I've been using Outlook for the past year with my school's email account. I haven't had any real problems other then the occasional freeze-up when starting it up, and that is more likely a Vista issue than Outlook. I really like the interface with the calender and task features, because it makes it easy to become your own taskmaster. I understand that the major downfall with desktop applications like Outlook are the mobility and data portability, but I don't think you could justify classifying Outlook as horrible.  David and Hannah, what do you think is so bad with Outlook?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:41:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xobni featured in New York Times</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/xobni_featured_in_new_york_times/#comment-419372</link><description>Xobni is open to the public as of today. &lt;a href="http://www.xobni.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt; Download Xobni Here! &lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 23:23:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xobni featured in New York Times</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/xobni_featured_in_new_york_times/#comment-417848</link><description>thanks for the correction</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 16:00:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xobni featured in New York Times</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/xobni_featured_in_new_york_times/#comment-417620</link><description>I wish I could try it but I'm on a Mac.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">daehee</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Xobni featured in New York Times</title><link>http://istbuilding.disqus.com/xobni_featured_in_new_york_times/#comment-417498</link><description>I am a current beta tester of Xobni, and I must say that I am extremely impressed. My only issue is with the phone number extraction. Xobni has problems with incorrectly linking phone numbers in the message to the sender. I don't know what sort of query that Xobni uses at the time being, but it seems like there should be more work put into it. It should look for contact information near the number to determine if it is the sender's number or someone else. I also wonder if there is any special query to locate the email signature. Overall, I think Xobni can go really big, and I'm  proud a Penn State IST alumni was a part of it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">skiermm89</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 14:53:25 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>