<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for srod710</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-94be46ce" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/srod710/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:14:21 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: A River of TWiT</title><link>http://leoville.com/2009/01/02/4085/#comment-4831982</link><description>If this works, it will be a "proof of concept" for XMPP and real-time streams. I would like to see some type of integration with twit army. I hope twit army does not become obsolete once twit.im launches. Still, I am very excited about all of this, I think Leo, Steve Gillmor and the rest of the gang will be seen a true visionaries just as Dave Winer was for RSS. History is being made.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:14:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ReCAPTCHA Me</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/10/27/1954/#comment-3330438</link><description>Leo, you have one more thing to add to your business card or resume: "Featured on a recaptcha"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 16:20:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Twitter the next Netscape? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/25/isTwitterTheNextNetscape.html#comment-3297486</link><description>Ok, if twitter is Netscape take 2, then what company do you think will buy twitter, and bail them out when things are going wrong?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2008 09:32:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John McCain in October 2000 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/24/johnMccainInOctober2000.html#comment-3287830</link><description>Well Dave, not to use a cliché, but great minds think alike.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:16:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full text in RSS? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/24/fullTextInRss.html#comment-3287571</link><description>Claiming that multiple feeds would be "too confusing" makes it sound like the reader is not clever enough to sort out the feeds on his or her own without mayhem. I tend to expect the utmost intelligence out of readers who were the ones who willing subscribed to the feed to begin with. Let people choose what they want.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:50:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Opie&amp;#8217;s For Obama</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/10/24/1912/#comment-3287445</link><description>Hahaha. Another fine example of fine viral marketing by Obama fans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:37:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: John McCain in October 2000 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/24/johnMccainInOctober2000.html#comment-3287412</link><description>I want the 2000 McCain back!! He has dulled down so much since then, and has turned into a bitter idiot.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:34:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Wassup 2008</title><link>http://leoville.com/2008/10/24/1915/#comment-3287364</link><description>This user-generated content that folks make for Obama is brilliant; however, when it comes to presidency, I would much rather have a technology illiterate old man(John McCain), than a foreign,economic novice who has NEVER held one minute of executive power.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full text in RSS? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/24/fullTextInRss.html#comment-3287322</link><description>Let's face it, truncating the feeds is a bit janky and is not nearly as intelligent as a handcrafted summarization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:26:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Full text in RSS? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/24/fullTextInRss.html#comment-3287296</link><description>I always feel deceived when RSS feeds are not full text. I like my stuff compartmentalized and not open in a huge number of tabs, which is what happens with partial text RSS feeds.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:24:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: FriendFeed's new realtime API (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/22/friendfeedsNewRealtimeApi.html#comment-3244325</link><description>This may be the thing that will end up propelling FriendFeed ahead of twitter. I really hope this happens, FF is much more elegant and forward thinking.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:50:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Random news of the day (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/10/02/randomNewsOfTheDay.html#comment-2812173</link><description>I'll defiantly be in the chat room tonight. Happy debating!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 19:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Comcast figures it out (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/20/comcastFiguresItOut.html#comment-2455266</link><description>Cable companys like comcast need to wake up; the future is not televisions or phone, but IPTV. They must change their strategy. No longer should they be a "cable" company, but a company that provides multimedia and services over the internet. As for their new policy, many power users should be semi-happy about this change. Comcast= the Gestapo</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:55:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Asus passed another test (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/20/asusPassedAnotherTest.html#comment-2455233</link><description>The folks at asus really have their ract together. Regarding Apple, I think there will be an "ultra-portable" mac out this year.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:50:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Greetings from New York City (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/19/greetingsFromNewYorkCity.html#comment-2447422</link><description>Glad to hear you are doing well!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 17:26:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do they give Republicans air time? (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/09/07/whyDoTheyGiveRepublicansAi.html#comment-2217229</link><description>Until recently, the dems did not do many non-liberal interviews eiether! I respect Obama for finally sitting down with o'reilly...not easy to do.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:07:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: extraview</title><link>http://extraview.org/post/42259804#comment-947181</link><description>Sandwich( A.K.A Adam) is simply brilliant.  Loved this episode hope to hear many more in the future.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 00:35:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why FriendFeed is growing faster than Twitter (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/07/06/whyFriendfeedIsGrowingFast.html#comment-824838</link><description>One of the major pitfalls of friend feed( form the user's perspective) is the initial learning curve. Many people who have been living of twitter become overwhelmed by FF .   Friend feed is aiming ot be the one-stop-shop for mini, personalized RSS feeds. I must say, the FF UI needs a major overhaul if it plans on expanding to a broader audience then just geeks.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">srod710</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 23:37:18 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>