<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for statisticsio</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/statisticsio/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:19:51 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Large Pages and SQL Server</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/large_pages_and_sql_server/#comment-12996890</link><description>Updated. &lt;a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2009/06/05/sql-server-and-large-pages-explained.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://blogs.msdn.com/psssql/archive/2009/06/05...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 10:19:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Firefighting with Wait Stats</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/firefighting_with_wait_stats/#comment-12518406</link><description>Jeff - This blog was migrated from &lt;a href="http://statisticsio.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://statisticsio.com&lt;/a&gt;. This looks like a bug in that move. Check out &lt;a href="http://statisticsio.com/Home/tabid/36/articleType/ArticleView/articleId/169/categoryId/14/CXPACKET-MAXDOP-and-your-OLTP-system.aspx" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://statisticsio.com/Home/tabid/36/articleTy...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 20:49:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Capt. Varchar &amp;amp; the Pagelatch Posse Vol. 26</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/capt_varchar_amp_the_pagelatch_posse_vol_26/#comment-12454509</link><description>The DBA is everywhere and nowhere until the observer comes into play.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 13:05:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scaling up vs. Scaling out</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/scaling_up_vs_scaling_out/#comment-12382475</link><description>It seems to me that until you squeeze out optimal performance from the existing hardware (as you note as the first line of defense), scaling out could have multiples greater power/heat costs than scaling up.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's all good and fine to get 10x the hardware for the dollar up front, but that savings can be eroded quite quickly if all you have is a farm of wasteful boxes drin(k)ing power and punishing your A/C.  Which is exactly what happens if you aren't first focused on optimizing things.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-14899456</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:55:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scaling up vs. Scaling out</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/scaling_up_vs_scaling_out/#comment-12381976</link><description>I haven't directly compared power and heat but the 785's mentioned in Jeff's post have 6 power supplies and are 7u. I doubt you would put more than two in a cabinet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:41:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Changing Face of Community</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/the_changing_face_of_community_21/#comment-12255712</link><description>I am still learning Wordpress apparently...&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://jasonmassie.com/archive/2009/01/the-changing-face-of-community/?dsq=12255622#comment-12255622" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://jasonmassie.com/archive/2009/01/the-chan...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:54:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Changing Face of Community</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/the_changing_face_of_community/#comment-12255035</link><description>First of all, you're not the only Internet user. Perhaps you are connected 24x7, but many people--myself included--are most definitely not.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Second, Twitter?! Sorry, but you've gone off the deep end if you think Twitter is any kind of replacement for NNTP. Twitter is a chat engine, designed for short, quick messages. It is not a forum for deep or involved conversations, and although some search capabilities exist they're a far cry from Google Groups. In addition, messages are barely threaded and it's far too easy to lose track of where a "discussion" is going. And it's certainly not any more real-time than NNTP. They both work on a very similar asynchronous request/response architecture. Please don't confuse the fact that your Twitter client asks for updates more often than your NNTP client might with whether one is more "real-time" than the other.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hell, this blog is a better medium for in-depth conversation than Twitter. Do you think I could have typed all of this out in 140-character increments?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Adam Machanic</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:38:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Changing Face of Community</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/the_changing_face_of_community/#comment-12254313</link><description>The ability to work offline is as relevant as postal mail. Now is the ability to work mobile.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I can't say anything about the distributed, fault tolerant point but I speculate the same guys that wrote the DNS rfc wrote the NNTP rfc. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Search is way better on twitter and friendfeed. It is a real time pulse of what is going on in the world. Real time is the key imo. Usenet can't do that by design.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have have to disagree with the tools thing too. It is way too easy to post to twitter or facebook. There even used to be a voice to text telephone number you could use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't get me wrong. I like the usenet and it works well but so did the pony express.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 10:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SQL Server is a Real Database</title><link>http://crisatunity.disqus.com/sql_server_is_a_real_database/#comment-4309553</link><description>Awesome Juice.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 10:31:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon to provide SQL Server "Cloud" Offering</title><link>http://tonybain.disqus.com/amazon_to_provide_sql_server_cloud_offering/#comment-2794299</link><description>I beleive it is something open, Xen (&lt;a href="http://www.xen.org/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.xen.org/&lt;/a&gt;).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">baint</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 00:29:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Amazon to provide SQL Server "Cloud" Offering</title><link>http://tonybain.disqus.com/amazon_to_provide_sql_server_cloud_offering/#comment-2793894</link><description>Do you have any idea if ec2 is just ESX server or something proprietary?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 23:33:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Update: Oracles Cloud Offering</title><link>http://tonybain.disqus.com/update_oracles_cloud_offering/#comment-2649686</link><description>Well then he obviously doesn't get it. Oracle on ec2 is not a cloud database. It is basically shared database hosting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:17:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: SQL Server 2008 RC0 coming soon? &gt;  &gt; SQL Server Blog by Jason Massie</title><link>http://statisticsio.disqus.com/sql_server_2008_rc0_coming_soon_sql_server_blog_by_jason_massie/#comment-529237</link><description>Test Comment</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">statisticsio</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 23:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>