<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for steverubel</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/steverubel/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:23:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why Apple &amp;amp; Google Win - and Your Company Doesn't</title><link>http://scottmonty.disqus.com/why_apple_amp_google_win_and_your_company_doesnt/#comment-19865120</link><description>Umm, ok.  So click and start typing is too hard if you're Steve Rubin.  Did your mom help you add that comment?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Obs</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:23:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple &amp;amp; Google Win - and Your Company Doesn't</title><link>http://scottmonty.disqus.com/why_apple_amp_google_win_and_your_company_doesnt/#comment-19850211</link><description>Haven't had the chance to see Google Wave yet. Even though it's being released in Google's constant state of "beta," I wonder if usability feedback will help fine tune it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scottmonty</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 11:39:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Apple &amp;amp; Google Win - and Your Company Doesn't</title><link>http://scottmonty.disqus.com/why_apple_amp_google_win_and_your_company_doesnt/#comment-19848453</link><description>This was true until Google Wave. Still remains true for Apple.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:28:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live from Virgin America #24 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/live_from_virgin_america_24_scripting_news/#comment-18444846</link><description>Thanks Steve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">dave</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:17:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live from Virgin America #24 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/live_from_virgin_america_24_scripting_news/#comment-18444697</link><description>Dave, so sorry for your loss. Please let me know if I can be of assistance.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 22:15:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bill would give President emergency control of Internet. In his dreams</title><link>http://venturebeat.disqus.com/bill_would_give_president_emergency_control_of_internet_in_his_dreams/#comment-15545196</link><description>Great photo!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:14:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13581701</link><description>I don't think so, no.  I've been prompted for updates twice previously by the alpha build, but just manually forced an update check, and it tells me I have the latest version.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evankline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:42:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13581231</link><description>Nuts, that's too bad! Is there a later build?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 20:27:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13580013</link><description>I just checked, and there is no option to install a portable version like there is in the desktop 3.0 version.  I'm guessing that may just be due to this being an alpha, but that's just a guess.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evankline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 19:48:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13550440</link><description>I didn't notice any problems with data integrity.  I had it installed on the same machine with the 3.0 version, too, and sometimes went back and forth between them (although I think I had the local database file for each in a different location).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evankline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 15:19:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13547069</link><description>Great. Any issues with data integrity either?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 14:19:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13545741</link><description>Good question- I will check it out when I get home this evening and report back.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">evankline</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:50:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: An Early Peak at Evernote&amp;#8217;s Next Windows&amp;#8217; Version</title><link>http://40tech.disqus.com/an_early_peak_at_evernote8217s_next_windows8217_version/#comment-13541777</link><description>Can you install it on a USB drive too?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:32:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: One of our heroes dies (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/one_of_our_heroes_dies_scripting_news/#comment-13125858</link><description>This hit me harder than MJ. What a loss. We will remember today. Viva Gidget!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 15:10:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/seesmics-web-offering-is-best-twitter.html</title><link>http://louisgray.disqus.com/thread_432/#comment-12533482</link><description>I have to agree with your thoughts here. I love the new Web client and have made it my default.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 06:30:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Tiny Annoyance in Posterous</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/tiny_annoyance_in_posterous/#comment-12381702</link><description>@Chris I email in the embed link as an iFrame and it works great (they recently added iframe support). Also, I send the YouTube link directly as someone suggests below.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:34:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging is back&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blogging_is_back8230/#comment-11968281</link><description>In July of 2008 I saw the same thing. I said the importance of blog linking was declining.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://louisgray.com/live/2008/07/importance-of-blog-linking-seems-to-be.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://louisgray.com/live/2008/07/importance-of...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is still important to be engaged with the community, but it just doesn't drive traffic. I used to think maybe it was because I had gotten more visible (like those who read Robert probably know who I am already), but it is true across the board. My top traffic sources are Google, followed by Friendfeed and Twitter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">louismg</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 01:59:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging is back&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blogging_is_back8230/#comment-11953436</link><description>Yes where is the "FriendFeed this comment"</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">seanandersen</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 20:14:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogging is back&amp;#8230;</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/blogging_is_back8230/#comment-11952866</link><description>Long ago (circa 2005-2006) a link from &lt;a href="http://Scobleizer.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;Scobleizer.com&lt;/a&gt; or Techcrunch would send thousands of people to my site. I was linked to by both sites in the last month and barely saw a blip - although many came under "direct" and Google which could have been your RSS feed. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nowadays, though, a link from twitter.com/mashable or twitter.com/garyvee can send thousands of readers. That's part of the reason why I moved from a blogging platform that can syndicate out and also bring back comments in from these same networks. So I agree, gravity has shifted. (leaving this on Frienfeed too under your post)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:49:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Back to Blogging Week (no FriendFeed/Twitter for a week?)</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/back_to_blogging_week_no_friendfeedtwitter_for_a_week/#comment-11869143</link><description>I look forward to watching and reading!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:28:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Still Rather Like Blogging</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/i_still_rather_like_blogging/#comment-11543023</link><description>In this ADHD world, you have a point Steve. It's amazing to me that the faster technology gets, the less time we seem to have. Shouldn't the inverse be true?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChrisDonaldson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:52:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Still Rather Like Blogging</title><link>http://chrisbrogan.disqus.com/i_still_rather_like_blogging/#comment-11542888</link><description>This is a good discussion to have- one that the fragmented nature of Twitter would make it impossible to do. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think that the "optimal" answer sits in between blogging and status updates. I would like to see the feature set Posterous and Friendfeed merge so that I can manage all my inflows and outflows from one interface but have it go everywhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, I still think about the future of long form content in an attention-starved world.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:44:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: That&amp;#039;s not what I ordered...</title><link>http://boomscriggity.disqus.com/that039s_not_what_i_ordered/#comment-10541217</link><description>We're pulling for you. Thank you for being so open.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:38:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR Agency Social Media Check In: Edelman</title><link>http://socialcocktails.disqus.com/pr_agency_social_media_check_in_edelman/#comment-10144554</link><description>Thanks Steve! As I said you were one of the key people getting me into this&lt;br&gt;space! Glad to see things come full circle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">kmaverick</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 06:35:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: PR Agency Social Media Check In: Edelman</title><link>http://socialcocktails.disqus.com/pr_agency_social_media_check_in_edelman/#comment-10074205</link><description>Thank you for noticing our work. I am only as strong as the people around me so my teammates deserve all of the credit!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">steverubel</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 12:13:43 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>