<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for toddsampson</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-4d5d6d39" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/toddsampson/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:30:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Threded conversations and platforms update</title><link>http://contextvoice.com/2009/07/27/threded-conversations-and-platforms-update/#comment-13424103</link><description>Very cool guys.... Congrats on the new launch.  Can't wait to try out the threaded feature.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/are-you-retweetable/#comment-7945547</link><description>Not really... That seemed to be the most popular retweet formatting when I wrote the post.  Lately I have seen a number of Twitter clients that built-in RT leave the colon out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for bring that up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web Applications and Society</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2009/03/31/web-applications-and-society/#comment-7737258</link><description>Thanks Saurabh.  I am hopeful that a more connected world gives greater incentive to drive more businesses (and people) to adopt that mindset.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Don&amp;#8217;t Media Companies Get It??</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2009/03/25/why-dont-media-companies-get-it/#comment-7514017</link><description>Spot on Ian.  That's a great way of looking at it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The analogy continues to work when you look at the way teams almost always loose when they switch to defense to protect a lead in the 4th quarter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://learntoduck.com/boulder/boulder-community#comment-6398181</link><description>Done!  I'll just cancel his return flight from San Francisco.  Please ship his family this way after you dig them out of the snow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S.  I hope you will still have me for TechStars. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:10:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://learntoduck.com/boulder/boulder-community#comment-6398057</link><description>Screw you guys... Orlando rules!  Boulder drools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Signed,&lt;br&gt;The guy still pissed Boulder stole away his heterosexual business lifemate Eric.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1st 2 Loud3r Be4a 5ites Live</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/02/19/1st-2-loud3r-be4a-5ites-live/#comment-5825359</link><description>Spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todd Sampson&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://toddsampson.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;toddsampson.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zentact listens - our new Journal</title><link>http://blog.zentact.com/2009/01/zentact-listens-our-new-journal/#comment-5566735</link><description>Awesome stuff guys, but the post title really should have been "Zentact: Now %99.9999 Less Annoying"... In any case, I agree with Joe Laz... Keep up the great work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meet the Team: Dixie</title><link>http://www.cloudspace.com/blog/2009/01/07/meet-the-team-dixie/#comment-5017081</link><description>Really liking the new "meet the team" stuff on the Cloudspace blog.  Thanks for the peek under the kimono.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/are-you-retweetable/#comment-4823028</link><description>Thanks Rahsheen... Glad you liked it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4788348</link><description>Well, I guess you can cross Google off that list:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/google-outsources-brainstorming-to-users-goog" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/google-outs...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4733788</link><description>I have nothing to add to that but, "Amen!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speaking of Tom Peters, here is a great post about Brand You ten years later:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tompeters.com/entries.php?rss=1&amp;note=http://www.tompeters.com/blogs/main/010790.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.tompeters.com/entries.php?rss=1&amp;note...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4733728</link><description>It is a very different calling.  But I bet quite a few managers in these companies are actually repressed leaders.  In any case, it will be fun to watch.  And I will continue to encourage anyone with the slightest desire to try to go for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4733680</link><description>Founders play a huge role in companies they are leading.  All the examples you threw out are people that are running the businesses they founded.  I was speaking specifically to the founders of acquired companies moving from a leadership roll to managing a group inside another organization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4733577</link><description>Very smart comment Rahmin.  And thanks for posting Umair's quote I sent via twitter here.  You are spot-on about the connection between these pieces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the press coverage Google receives is to be at all believed, they should shed some light on the scalability of taking risks and innovation.  They have supposedly baked in taking risks to the core of their business.  It will be interesting to watch if the fear of loss (or pure scale) kills off taking risk in the end.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone else has other good examples of companies to watch in this space, I would love to see them posted in the comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/leadership-management-and-acquisitions/#comment-4733019</link><description>Hey Seth... Thanks so much for the comment.  As I mention in the post, I have been a big fan for years.  Though, until reading Tribes, I didn't know about your Yahoo! acquisition.  Great stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/are-you-retweetable/#comment-4732776</link><description>Agreed, for the most part on the RT stuff, but an (RT @user &lt;a href="http://posturl" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://posturl&lt;/a&gt;) at the end of a tweet wouldn't kill it entirely.  Besides the RT is more about forwarding a concept to people following you than giving your take on it.  Two tweets might make the most sense in that case.  RT the message in the first tweet and give your comment in the second.  Something like "CO: " for Comment On (or "RE: " to follow the more standard reply format) might work as well; but it would need wide adoption for people to understand what is going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also agreed on the platform comment if you define "platform" as the service itself, it's evolving usage by end-users, and 3rd party offerings built around the core system.  Those are changing very frequently.  The service itself is remaining relatively consistent -- which is fine if they weren't limiting what services like Gnip can re-syndicate.  Due to this last factor, it is starting to feel to me that it is a bit to important to be a service as opposed to a standard (like email)... In any case, it is fun to watch it evolve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:01:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should I Sell My Startup?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/22/should-i-sell-my-startup/#comment-4731881</link><description>Great point David.  I'll make sure I add that to the response I give next time I am asked.  (Or need to consider it myself.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Merry Christmas to All</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/25/merry-christmas-to-all/#comment-4731840</link><description>Hey Brenda... Great to hear from you!  I have forwarded your info to Lissy so you two can catch-up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/are-you-retweetable/#comment-4731610</link><description>Interesting thought.  I have always been anti-editing, personally.  But I can see the argument for both sides.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you need more space, I would probably blog the response and link to it via Twitter or just put in a link to the original tweet message you are responding to.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:24:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://www.toddsampson.com/2008/12/16/are-you-retweetable/#comment-4731629</link><description>That's awesome Saurabh!  Love the hack.  You okay with me publicly promoting it yet?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:24:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Upgrading your profile for Zentact</title><link>http://blog.zentact.com/2008/12/upgrading-your-profile-for-zentact/#comment-4729232</link><description>Great post -- I'm a big Kawasaki fan.  I have already had a good half-dozen matches with Zentact that have allowed me to reach out and re-engage in building our relationships.  Keep up the good work.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 14:13:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: bijansabet.com | a tumblelog by Bijan Sabet | We’ve had one of these before, when the dot-com...</title><link>http://bijansabet.com/post/64727069#comment-4395165</link><description>Hell yes!!!  This is the same message I have been telling everyone that will listen.  It is why the guys at Cloudspace have increased the size of their team by 20% over the last few months and will be growing more soon.  It is also why Yahoo! bringing in The Bobs (er. Bain) to downsize now is so dumb.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You can't cut your way to success.  Use Pareto's Law, but use it to grow.  John Hagel had a great piece on this recently:  &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/L2s7" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://bit.ly/L2s7&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is the perfect environment to get ahead if you have vision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for posting this one Bijan.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 01:54:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Success Stories</title><link>http://blog.zentact.com/2008/12/success-stories/#comment-4394391</link><description>I have had several great experiences during early beta testing on Zentact.  The one that sticks out the most was actually a basic name match, not a tag I had put in -- though I have had several of those that have already helped me to re-spark old relationships as well.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I was reading one of my favorite design blogs (&lt;a href="http://JoshSpear.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;JoshSpear.com&lt;/a&gt;) and I got a match for "Emily Goligoski."  At first, I couldn't figure out why her name was showing up.  Then, after clicking her name link to jump me down the page, I noticed that she had authored the story I was reading.  Subsequent conversations let me know that she had been writing for the blog for several months and gave us a chance to catch-up.  Great stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 00:06:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zentact's Gmail Integration</title><link>http://www.cloudspace.com/blog/2008/12/11/zentacts-gmail-integration/#comment-4337225</link><description>Love this.  Next level DOM manipulation via add-on -- brilliant.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 18:55:23 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>