<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for toddsampson</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/toddsampson/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:57:02 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Replacing Twitter&amp;#8217;s Track Function</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/replacing_twitter8217s_track_function_99/#comment-17763791</link><description>this helped me a lot. and i hope twitter will return their trackback function</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">printer1</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 05:57:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Threded conversations and platforms update</title><link>http://ubervu.disqus.com/threded_conversations_and_platforms_update/#comment-13424103</link><description>Very cool guys.... Congrats on the new launch.  Can't wait to try out the threaded feature.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:30:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/are_you_retweetable/#comment-7945547</link><description>Not really... That seemed to be the most popular retweet formatting when I wrote the post.  Lately I have seen a number of Twitter clients that built-in RT leave the colon out.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks for bring that up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 15:26:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Web Applications and Society</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/web_applications_and_society/#comment-7737258</link><description>Thanks Saurabh.  I am hopeful that a more connected world gives greater incentive to drive more businesses (and people) to adopt that mindset.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 03:02:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Don&amp;#8217;t Media Companies Get It??</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/why_don8217t_media_companies_get_it/#comment-7514017</link><description>Spot on Ian.  That's a great way of looking at it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The analogy continues to work when you look at the way teams almost always loose when they switch to defense to protect a lead in the 4th quarter.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:54:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/we_dont_need_to_be_noisy_to_create_noise/#comment-6398312</link><description>Sucker! We totally win. Do you know how rad 12 hats with ears are?  Especially with my name embroidered on the back of all of them?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;We haven't had snow in awhile. I've been wearing shorts.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jen and the young-ins weren't part of the deal. What else do we get?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">micah</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:25:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/we_dont_need_to_be_noisy_to_create_noise/#comment-6398181</link><description>Done!  I'll just cancel his return flight from San Francisco.  Please ship his family this way after you dig them out of the snow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;P.S.  I hope you will still have me for TechStars. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:10:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/we_dont_need_to_be_noisy_to_create_noise/#comment-6398111</link><description>I will trade you Eric for the Monorail and 2 dozen of those hats with ears.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">micah</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:02:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We Dont Need to be Noisy to Create Noise</title><link>http://micahbaldwin.disqus.com/we_dont_need_to_be_noisy_to_create_noise/#comment-6398057</link><description>Screw you guys... Orlando rules!  Boulder drools.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Signed,&lt;br&gt;The guy still pissed Boulder stole away his heterosexual business lifemate Eric.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:55:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 1st 2 Loud3r Be4a 5ites Live</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/1st_2_loud3r_be4a_5ites_live/#comment-5825359</link><description>Spam.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;- T&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Todd Sampson&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://toddsampson.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;toddsampson.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 21:25:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zentact listens - our new Journal</title><link>http://zentact.disqus.com/zentact_listens_our_new_journal_96/#comment-5567239</link><description>hah - well spoken todd and well done zentact team :)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;sounds like the journal will become my primary point of contact with zentact.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;unrelated question, can i tag myself such that others can use my self selected tags as a basis to send me info? (does that makes sense?)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Similarly, I'm unlikely to tag most of my contacts, but would love to use the collective tags that they have in the system as a basis for outreach. there is some potential creepiness factor here somewhere to be mindful of if implementing such a feature.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">rahmin</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:08:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Zentact listens - our new Journal</title><link>http://zentact.disqus.com/zentact_listens_our_new_journal_96/#comment-5566735</link><description>Awesome stuff guys, but the post title really should have been "Zentact: Now %99.9999 Less Annoying"... In any case, I agree with Joe Laz... Keep up the great work!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:43:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Meet the Team: Dixie</title><link>http://thecloudspaceblog.disqus.com/meet_the_team_dixie/#comment-5017081</link><description>Really liking the new "meet the team" stuff on the Cloudspace blog.  Thanks for the peek under the kimono.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 13:52:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/are_you_retweetable/#comment-4823028</link><description>Thanks Rahsheen... Glad you liked it!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2009 21:42:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4788348</link><description>Well, I guess you can cross Google off that list:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/google-outsources-brainstorming-to-users-goog" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.alleyinsider.com/2008/12/google-outs...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:56:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/are_you_retweetable/#comment-4740566</link><description>Thanks Todd. Sure, that is absolutely fine :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">saurabhsahni</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 02:15:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4733788</link><description>I have nothing to add to that but, "Amen!"&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speaking of Tom Peters, here is a great post about Brand You ten years later:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.tompeters.com/entries.php?rss=1&amp;note=http://www.tompeters.com/blogs/main/010790.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.tompeters.com/entries.php?rss=1&amp;note...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:40:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4733728</link><description>It is a very different calling.  But I bet quite a few managers in these companies are actually repressed leaders.  In any case, it will be fun to watch.  And I will continue to encourage anyone with the slightest desire to try to go for it.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:36:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4733680</link><description>Founders play a huge role in companies they are leading.  All the examples you threw out are people that are running the businesses they founded.  I was speaking specifically to the founders of acquired companies moving from a leadership roll to managing a group inside another organization.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:33:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4733577</link><description>Very smart comment Rahmin.  And thanks for posting Umair's quote I sent via twitter here.  You are spot-on about the connection between these pieces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If the press coverage Google receives is to be at all believed, they should shed some light on the scalability of taking risks and innovation.  They have supposedly baked in taking risks to the core of their business.  It will be interesting to watch if the fear of loss (or pure scale) kills off taking risk in the end.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If anyone else has other good examples of companies to watch in this space, I would love to see them posted in the comments.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:27:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Leadership, Management and Acquisitions</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/leadership_management_and_acquisitions/#comment-4733019</link><description>Hey Seth... Thanks so much for the comment.  As I mention in the post, I have been a big fan for years.  Though, until reading Tribes, I didn't know about your Yahoo! acquisition.  Great stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:17:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/are_you_retweetable/#comment-4732776</link><description>Agreed, for the most part on the RT stuff, but an (RT @user &lt;a href="http://posturl" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://posturl&lt;/a&gt;) at the end of a tweet wouldn't kill it entirely.  Besides the RT is more about forwarding a concept to people following you than giving your take on it.  Two tweets might make the most sense in that case.  RT the message in the first tweet and give your comment in the second.  Something like "CO: " for Comment On (or "RE: " to follow the more standard reply format) might work as well; but it would need wide adoption for people to understand what is going on.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also agreed on the platform comment if you define "platform" as the service itself, it's evolving usage by end-users, and 3rd party offerings built around the core system.  Those are changing very frequently.  The service itself is remaining relatively consistent -- which is fine if they weren't limiting what services like Gnip can re-syndicate.  Due to this last factor, it is starting to feel to me that it is a bit to important to be a service as opposed to a standard (like email)... In any case, it is fun to watch it evolve.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 17:01:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are You Retweetable?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/are_you_retweetable/#comment-4731906</link><description>The problem with that is that it loses the RT function. I get what you're saying, but I don't think it has the right affect. Sooper neat to watch this platform grow though, isn't it?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">msitarzewski</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:41:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should I Sell My Startup?</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/should_i_sell_my_startup/#comment-4731881</link><description>Great point David.  I'll make sure I add that to the response I give next time I am asked.  (Or need to consider it myself.)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:39:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Merry Christmas to All</title><link>http://toddsampson.disqus.com/merry_christmas_to_all/#comment-4731840</link><description>Hey Brenda... Great to hear from you!  I have forwarded your info to Lissy so you two can catch-up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toddsampson</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:37:31 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>