<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for wesjustice</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#usercomments-200d39c4" type="application/json"/><link>http://disqus.com/people/wesjustice/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:12:09 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: On Message? You Missed The Point.</title><link>http://www.socialmediaexplorer.com/2008/11/12/on-message-you-missed-the-point/#comment-3702960</link><description>If PR pros are WTFing over Hagan, they must be leaping off of very tall buildings over Palin.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wesjustice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 10:12:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: State of the Twitter, June 2008 (Scripting News)</title><link>http://www.scripting.com/stories/2008/06/28/stateOfTheTwitterJune2008.html#comment-770167</link><description>Dave, I totally agree with your sentiment here, but there's one thing I don't get.  With FF, comments are *everywhere*.  Take your post re: Obama yesterday.  You've got:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;42 comments on the blog itself.&lt;br&gt;14 comments on FF's link to the blog post.&lt;br&gt;24 comments on FF's link to the tweet where you mentioned the blog post.&lt;br&gt;Who knows how many twitter-only replies that didn't make it FF.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Don't all these fragmented conversations drive you nuts, considering they're all related to the same single post?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">wesjustice</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 13:03:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>