<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of xenon2021</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/xenon2021/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:13:30 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Jessica&amp;#8217;s Quick and Easy Healthy Chili</title><link>http://primecutsblog.com/2009/09/24/jessicas-quick-and-easy-healthy-chili/#comment-17337641</link><description>Kevin LOL!! Way to skool Jessica then end it with a polite: "But, like I said, it still looks tasty." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And seriously, I am anti-vegan-vegetarian-organic-episcopalian(?)-FULL-BLOWN-carnivore but you don't even KNOW how good her chili is. #CantMakeThisCrapUp</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:13:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jessica&amp;#8217;s Quick and Easy Healthy Chili</title><link>http://primecutsblog.com/2009/09/24/jessicas-quick-and-easy-healthy-chili/#comment-17337296</link><description>You tricked me. I ate soy crumbles. And I liked it. Still not sure how I feel 'bout that, but damn straight your EFin chili is BOMB.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:02:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/lazyfeed-poised-to-debut-real-time.html</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/07/lazyfeed-poised-to-debut-real-time.html#comment-12942016</link><description>On a completely unrelated note, LG can you tell Daniel that Disqus is majorly broken? Facebook Connect has been borked since who knows when and timezones are completely screwed up. :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 02:55:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5742090</link><description>You understood that comment...? I STILL don't get it, Aaron... :(</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 02:34:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5741279</link><description>Given Leaword Kansas' weather conditions as illustrated by this graph: &lt;a href="http://pics2.city-data.com/w4/wnd8200.png" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://pics2.city-data.com/w4/wnd8200.png&lt;/a&gt;, it is Apple's responsibility to ensure the store is weather proof. But again, I am not here to argue legal issues. I am talking about the principle and concept of customer service 101.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:53:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5741241</link><description>Which means if proof was provided, they will be responsible. Thus, legally, yes they are.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:48:53 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5741173</link><description>"I think it would be fair if Apple wrote them a short email/letter thanking them for shopping at their store and apologizing for the unfortunate incident. It would also be reasonable to give them a Gift Card or voucher or something, but not compulsory." = bingo.  &lt;br&gt;"Also, expecting Steve or the VP to reply is silly. Maybe the Store or Regional Manager would get involved." = I agree with the Jobs part, but doesn't a retail executive's job entail overseeing retail operations?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:41:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5741019</link><description>It's more the principle - that they (the execs) should care. It only takes a few seconds out of someone's day to pick up the phone and say: "Thank you for being loyal customers." or "We appreciate you." or even "Thank you for taking the time to reach out." I am realistic and understand the execs probably receive thousands of emails a day. It just reflects really bad on the top execs, to not train their chain of command to at least filter or notify them of something as horrible as a glass door shattering on paying customers.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:24:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5740969</link><description>I hear you, as well as what everyone else is saying - but I am huge advocate for customer service, customer relations, and simply appreciating those that help corporations like Apple be who they are. I don't think Apple needed to acknowledge or thank them in any way for not filing a lawsuit, but at least something, anything to show they DO care about their customers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's just good business practice and reflects well for brand preservation, especially because of the recent PR nightmare events. ;) Thanks for your input (and for being able to discuss amicably!)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 00:19:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5740684</link><description>Seriously, Leslie? A Fortune 500 Company with thousands of employees and after the son reached out to the corporate office, yet it was only acknowledged by the claims department? It's bad business practice and customer service.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:50:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5740004</link><description>Considering Kansas is known for strong winds, yes, in theory, Apple should've factored that in when designing. Big picture, Anthony - quit dwellign on the small stuff.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:57:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739976</link><description>Legally, yes they are. It is on their property. But that's not the point. Point is, something terrible happened, things happen. Preserve their brand and rectify the situation. Is one e-mail that hard?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:55:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739875</link><description>Whoa looks like I hit a fanboy nerve. Hey, guess what? I'M GONNA BOOTCAMP WINDOWS ON MY MAC!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:49:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739861</link><description>Or something, anything to acknowledge what happened. Customer service goes a long way. :)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:48:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739798</link><description>Apple is responsible for what happens in the stores. Period.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:44:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739595</link><description>Special treatment? Since when has an apology been special treatment? It's called manners, common courtesy, and DECENCY.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:40:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5739270</link><description>Are you serious? Or a delusional fan boy? Of course it is Apple's fault. What happened to them was not something Apple could've predicted but to just have the claims department contact them to make sure they won't sue is appalling. Apple needs to get off their high horse and recognize that it's the customers that are keeping them afloat. For them to not even acknowledge the latter and issue an apology is disgusting. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tripping over an uneven ground and getting showered by a glass explosion are two very different things. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's fanboys like you that are excusing Apple's unacceptable methods, which will be their greatest downfall when Steve steps down.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:40:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738889</link><description>I LOVE Apple - well their products but customer service wise they seriously fail. I don't understand what makes it OK to not even issue an apology. Disgusting.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:35:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738867</link><description>Tamar you are so funny. I have no idea, since I got this from Giz. hahahha</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:33:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738856</link><description>I agree but the company needs to go on without him and they are definitely not moving in the right direction.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:32:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738835</link><description>Common courtesy and a little decency. Apple's customer service is seriously appalling.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:31:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738824</link><description>The LEAST Apple could've done was issue an apology. It reflects bad on the company. Period.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:31:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Who Does Apple Think They Are?</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2009/01/who-does-apple-think-they-are.html#comment-5738817</link><description>Hmmmm not sure I understand your comment.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:30:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Microsoft and RIM? I Don't Think So.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/microsoft-and-rim-i-dont-think-so.html#comment-5642045</link><description>Ok! You are right and I am wrong. I will not be reincarnated and probably&lt;br&gt;going to hell. You are so smart. You win the Internet! Hooray!&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;m.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:10:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: louisgray.com: Microsoft and RIM? I Don't Think So.</title><link>http://blog.louisgray.com/2008/10/microsoft-and-rim-i-dont-think-so.html#comment-5638260</link><description>Just out of curiosity, did you keep up with CES? As I predicted, no Zune phone and Ballmer implied MSFT doesn't have plans to go into hardware. Gloating isn't my style (it's tacky) plus it isn't the Zen way - I am Buddhist by default buuuuuut since tomorrow is my birthday: I told you so! &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you and have a nice day!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mona</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:33:46 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>