<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for xian</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/xian/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:13:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Are Democrats Boosting Daggett in New Jersey? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/are_democrats_boosting_daggett_in_new_jersey_political_wire/#comment-21699440</link><description>No, it's a completely accurate description.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The NJDNC does not want Dagget to win, right?&lt;br&gt;They're trying to convince Republicans to vote for him, right?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Add those two things together and you get a robocall to support someone they don't want to win.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JasonMBryant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:13:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Democrats Boosting Daggett in New Jersey? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/are_democrats_boosting_daggett_in_new_jersey_political_wire/#comment-21698575</link><description>that's a stretch.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:58:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Democrats Boosting Daggett in New Jersey? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/are_democrats_boosting_daggett_in_new_jersey_political_wire/#comment-21697320</link><description>The NJDSC is trying to get votes for a particular candidate without telling the people they're talking to that the NJDSC doesn't actually want that guy to win. They're making it look like they support him when they really don't.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">JasonMBryant</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:37:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Democrats Boosting Daggett in New Jersey? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/are_democrats_boosting_daggett_in_new_jersey_political_wire/#comment-21696649</link><description>how exactly is that a dirty trick?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:25:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The biggest difference between Twitter and Facebook</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/the_biggest_difference_between_twitter_and_facebook/#comment-20940851</link><description>If it filters on engagement how does a new item get shown to anyone before anyone's liked it or commented on it? Or do I misunderstand?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:20:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: DIY UX at An Event Apart Chicago 2009</title><link>http://whitneyhess.disqus.com/diy_ux_at_an_event_apart_chicago_2009/#comment-20655428</link><description>Your learning curve is scary fast! Good for you for taking adversity and making use of it to rapidly improve your performance. You are inspiring a lot of people (myself among them).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:04:21 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are Republicans Conceding on Health Care? -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/are_republicans_conceding_on_health_care_political_wire/#comment-19461730</link><description>that's what happened under LBJ too... if you can't beat 'em....&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;rope-a-dope, baby!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:51:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: August Was Not So Bad for the White House -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/august_was_not_so_bad_for_the_white_house_political_wire/#comment-17034941</link><description>Totally. I heard there were 18 million people at the rally. Were you there? I didn't see either of you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:54:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/quote_of_the_day_political_wire_0917/#comment-16976033</link><description>also very Slavic accent and having no idea how articles work in English. In soviet Russia authoritarian news channel watches you.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:34:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/quote_of_the_day_political_wire_0917/#comment-16972632</link><description>that's funny. the Sunnis in Iraq thought they had a majority too.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 07:29:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/quote_of_the_day_political_wire_0917/#comment-16938217</link><description>hardly. why empower lunatics and liars. enjoy your echo chamber.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:08:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/quote_of_the_day_political_wire_0917/#comment-16937838</link><description>Ttue. So what did we learn fro it ?&lt;br&gt;1. That there is only ONE network which is not in bed with him.&lt;br&gt;2. That he is a chicken to face tough questions.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ChicagoDude</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 21:02:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Quote of the Day -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/quote_of_the_day_political_wire_0917/#comment-16933977</link><description>exactly: Obama has specifically noted that there's a network dedicated to tearing him down through misinformation. Why exactly should he facilitate that?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2009 18:11:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Santorum Confirms He's Considering White House Bid -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/santorum_confirms_hes_considering_white_house_bid_political_wire/#comment-16636051</link><description>Bachmann-Palin Overdrive!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:11:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: More Reactions to Obama's Speech -- Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/more_reactions_to_obamas_speech_political_wire/#comment-16395392</link><description>this system deters legal immigrants while hardly ever "catching" illegals (who tend not to present themselves to government-run institutions if at all possible).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 20:02:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polish &amp;amp; Predictability</title><link>http://buildingreputation.disqus.com/polish_amp_predictability/#comment-16314709</link><description>Cate rocks! Glad to hear you guys are collaborating. Just thinking of Bryce, Randy, Mary, and Cate all playing a part in bringing this book out gladdens my heart.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:48:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: author:catespoints    [Building Web 2.0 Reputation Systems]</title><link>http://buildingreputation.disqus.com/authorcatespoints_building_web_20_reputation_systems/#comment-16314338</link><description>is your editor Cate de Heer by any chance?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 13:40:52 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Republicans Abandoning Health Care Talks? -- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/republicans_abandoning_health_care_talks_taegan_goddards_political_wire/#comment-15741934</link><description>as comedian David Cross put it: "I'm not saying all Republicans are racist... just that the people they elect to represent them are."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:48:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Candidate Jokes About Shooting President -- Taegan Goddard's Political Wire</title><link>http://politicalwire.disqus.com/candidate_jokes_about_shooting_president_taegan_goddards_political_wire_71/#comment-15739873</link><description>the language is so stilted and strange, that he would not "support" assassination of the president - I mean wtf!?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:40:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ratings Bias Effects</title><link>http://buildingreputation.disqus.com/ratings_bias_effects/#comment-15148518</link><description>twas ever thus. the rich get richer: "They search, and the results with the highest ratings appear first and if the user has experienced that object, they may well also rate it - if it is easy to do so - and most likely will give 5 stars..."</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:56:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble, your blog still loves you (Scripting News)</title><link>http://scripting.disqus.com/scoble_your_blog_still_loves_you_scripting_news/#comment-14988723</link><description>all we need is following/connection and better aggregation (contextual filters)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:16:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five anti-patterns of social networks &amp;ndash; All-Encompassing Trip</title><link>http://gesteves.disqus.com/five_anti_patterns_of_social_networks_ndash_all_encompassing_trip/#comment-14515542</link><description>So if I reply to this email message Disqus sent me (notifying me that you&lt;br&gt;posted a followup to my&lt;br&gt;reply), Disqus will recognize it as a reply to you, a followup post of&lt;br&gt;my own, or both? Let's see.&lt;br&gt;-x-</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:46:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five anti-patterns of social networks &amp;ndash; All-Encompassing Trip</title><link>http://gesteves.disqus.com/five_anti_patterns_of_social_networks_ndash_all_encompassing_trip/#comment-14515268</link><description>If I recall correctly, Disqus has had it since day one. I'm using it  &lt;br&gt;right now. :-)</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">toldorknown</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 11:33:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Five anti-patterns of social networks &amp;ndash; All-Encompassing Trip</title><link>http://gesteves.disqus.com/five_anti_patterns_of_social_networks_ndash_all_encompassing_trip/#comment-14514497</link><description>Twitter's direct message notification is a perfect example of the Don't Break Email anti-pattern. Basecamp used to break email but then implemented a clever reply-handling feature.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 10:54:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: open:animal    [Building Web 2.0 Reputation Systems]</title><link>http://buildingreputation.disqus.com/openanimal_building_web_20_reputation_systems/#comment-13487584</link><description>you not social till you've got spammers! :D</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 20:00:49 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>