<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for xxdesmus</title><link>http://disqus.com/people/xxdesmus/</link><description></description><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:37:20 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: 5 Must-Have iPhone Apps for Wine Lovers</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/5_must_have_iphone_apps_for_wine_lovers/#comment-22153612</link><description>I'll put in another vote for:  Wine Ph.D. ...even if the wine is missing from the dB just add it manually (really not that tough), and they will email you once it's been added to the dB (usually within a few days at most). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wine Ph.D. is not perfect, but it's the best wine app I've used (and I've tried almost all of them).</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:37:20 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Speed Up Windows 7</title><link>http://mwdtech.disqus.com/how_to_speed_up_windows_7/#comment-22153387</link><description>...and yet it still doesn't actually make any noticeable difference.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:27:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Speed Up Windows 7</title><link>http://mwdtech.disqus.com/how_to_speed_up_windows_7/#comment-22153343</link><description>Dude that was um 2008 , welcome to Windows 7 2009</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">livecrunch</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:25:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to Speed Up Windows 7</title><link>http://mwdtech.disqus.com/how_to_speed_up_windows_7/#comment-22153116</link><description>You do you continue to spread this BS myth about changing the # of processors in MSCONFIG?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/08/09/tweaking-myth-increase-boot-performance-for-multi-core-users-with-msconfig/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.withinwindows.com/2008/08/09/tweakin...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It doesn't do a darn thing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 17:18:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: iPhone and Windows 7 Don&amp;#8217;t Play Nice, No Fix in Sight</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/iphone_and_windows_7_don8217t_play_nice_no_fix_in_sight/#comment-21665832</link><description>Way to go for the sensationalist headlines. Wow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Been using Windows 7 and my iPhone for over a year now. NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM TO DATE. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If you'd like me to repeat that one: Windows 7 and the iPhone PLAY NICE just fine. ...back your regular scheduled alarmist headlines.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 09:20:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: New CNN.com Goes Live: What Do You Think?</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/new_cnncom_goes_live_what_do_you_think/#comment-21027081</link><description>I think it looks really cheap. It looks like it's a "select a design" from a pre-packaged set of themes in Dreamweaver. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It looks far less authoritative in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:07:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple Fires Back at Windows 7 in New Ads</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/apple_fires_back_at_windows_7_in_new_ads/#comment-20853539</link><description>Same Apple bull****, different day. How about you focus on making a decent operating system, and spend a little less time with these pointless ads. It's pretty pathetic when you continue to make advertisement after advertisement trashing the competition (mostly with lies I might add) without actually telling consumers WHY they should buy your overpriced computers instead. Grow up. Get over yourself, and how about you spend some of that money on R&amp;D instead.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:44:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dvorak joins the Win7 basher brigade</title><link>http://fakesteve.disqus.com/dvorak_joins_the_win7_basher_brigade/#comment-20776758</link><description>Dvorak is just an arrogant idiot who likes to create soundbites. He's upset that Microsoft hasn't personally called in the past 4 years? Who gives a damn? Maybe you're just not that important anymore. Get over yourself.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 08:14:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: EU and Microsoft Near Browser Agreement</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/eu_and_microsoft_near_browser_agreement/#comment-19436045</link><description>So idiotic, the damn EU can't make up their minds already. What a joke.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:11:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave crashes on beach of overhype</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_wave_crashes_on_beach_of_overhype/#comment-18347459</link><description>You don't have to watch them type in real time if you don't want to. The reason they included that is because they've learnt from analysing IM conversations that they take a lot longer than they need to because one person types their message, then sends, then the other person receives, reads, writes their response, sends (while the first person has to wait for a while), and vice versa. The idea of showing the live typing of the other people in the wave, assuming you happen to be viewing it at exactly the same time as they are editing/adding to it, is to simply speed up conversations. Try it and you will discover how well this works.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not just document collaboration, it's updating websites (you can paste a wave into any web page using a widget, and it will auto-update whenever the wave is updated). Robert could write each of his blog posts as a wave from his wave client (Google aren't the only people providing these, by the way - it's an open protocol so anyone can), and edit them if necessary. Replies/comments could come in as part of the wave too, so he can manage all of them in one piece of software, along with any other public conversations on the web that he's been participating that are also part of a wave, as well as his privates one with his family, friends etc., maybe with some cool tech PR peeps, or whatever.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also there is the wave playback/review facility which I don't think I've seen anywhere else done in the same way (literally works like playing a YouTube video, but not in the confines of a stream of video/audio - instead all of the updates that have been made, so you can step through them, like you might when you're debugging code).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There's also the whole concept of wavelets, which are the updates within a wave - info at &lt;a href="http://www.waveprotocol.org/presentations" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.waveprotocol.org/presentations&lt;/a&gt; - and waves and wavelets each individually belong on a server, like a web page,  or a Google Doc. This means companies can run their own wave server, just like they currently run their own mail servers,  but now all communications within a particular conversation are managed/grouped/linked all together (as a wave), instead of disjointed individual e-mails that get messy etc. and mangled between different e-mail systems.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-782095485</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:31:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave crashes on beach of overhype</title><link>http://scobleizer.disqus.com/google_wave_crashes_on_beach_of_overhype/#comment-18000313</link><description>I couldn't agree more. This will end up being YAFGI -- Yet Another Failed Google Initiative. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I like email. It lets me decide who is important when I should read their emails. I don't want to see them typing in real time. If I want an instant reply I'll IM the person. The only possible use I see for Google Wave is collaborative document creation -- like for school or work. That's it. That being said, better options exist already for collaboration.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:30:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Gmail Comes to iPhone and Other Mobiles</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/push_gmail_comes_to_iphone_and_other_mobiles/#comment-17951233</link><description>iPhone does not sync properly. Only download certain messages to the phone and not others.&lt;br&gt;Also push feature does not push. Emails take forever to show up.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Name</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:00:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GAME TIME: Google Starts Sending Wave Invites</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/game_time_google_starts_sending_wave_invites/#comment-17943955</link><description>I'd love an invite if you have any left -- jaxiakiley at gmail.  Thanks so much!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jaxia</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 13:07:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: GAME TIME: Google Starts Sending Wave Invites</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/game_time_google_starts_sending_wave_invites/#comment-17933344</link><description>got in ...really not that impressed yet.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 11:11:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Obama Assassination Poll Rocks Facebook</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/obama_assassination_poll_rocks_facebook/#comment-17741191</link><description>Wow, people really suck sometimes.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:06:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Verdict: AT&amp;#038;T Survives iPhone MMS Rollout</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/verdict_at038t_survives_iphone_mms_rollout/#comment-17399823</link><description>haven't been able to receive an MMS message successfully -- it comes across as some garbled text that looks like code from a HTML webpage. I can send MMS just fine though.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:56:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Courier: Microsoft Has an Apple Tablet Rival, And It Looks Impressive</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/courier_microsoft_has_an_apple_tablet_rival_and_it_looks_impressive/#comment-17158458</link><description>I never said it was *likely* they'd keep it under $400. :P  It's just wishful thinking on my part. Anything over $400 will make it a hard sell in my opinion.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:40:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Courier: Microsoft Has an Apple Tablet Rival, And It Looks Impressive</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/courier_microsoft_has_an_apple_tablet_rival_and_it_looks_impressive/#comment-17158381</link><description>with its dual eee-like display it should cost at least 30% more than a netbook</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-649964030</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:38:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Courier: Microsoft Has an Apple Tablet Rival, And It Looks Impressive</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/courier_microsoft_has_an_apple_tablet_rival_and_it_looks_impressive/#comment-17157565</link><description>Likewise. Except, it'd have to be AUD not USD.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">twitter-51355371</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:18:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Courier: Microsoft Has an Apple Tablet Rival, And It Looks Impressive</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/courier_microsoft_has_an_apple_tablet_rival_and_it_looks_impressive/#comment-17157472</link><description>I'd buy one in a second if they can keep the price under $400. This thing looks incredible.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:16:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Gmail Comes to iPhone and Other Mobiles</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/push_gmail_comes_to_iphone_and_other_mobiles/#comment-17154884</link><description>Did any of you have any issues setting it up like I did (and posted about previously)?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">facebook-653858004</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:03:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Gmail Comes to iPhone and Other Mobiles</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/push_gmail_comes_to_iphone_and_other_mobiles/#comment-17148824</link><description>I'm having ALL kinds of problems with this. Email taking forever to load.  All my emails disappearing from my phone! Reappearing later. Not to mention its definitely not picking up all my mail.  Unimpressed</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Justin</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:20:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Gmail Comes to iPhone and Other Mobiles</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/push_gmail_comes_to_iphone_and_other_mobiles/#comment-17143342</link><description>I went back to &lt;a href="http://NuevaSync.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;NuevaSync.com&lt;/a&gt; for now -- I'll wait a few weeks for Google to get their act together on this.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:21:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Preview Project Retweet in Various Twitter Apps [PICS]</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/preview_project_retweet_in_various_twitter_apps_pics/#comment-17142706</link><description>Same here. I have no idea how it will actually work. For instance in my client of choice (Tweetie), will I suddenly just start seeing Tweets from people I don't follow? Will it be indicated who retweeted them? Will you be able to add comments to your retweets?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I'm lost.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">lars_christian</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 16:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Push Gmail Comes to iPhone and Other Mobiles</title><link>http://mashable.disqus.com/push_gmail_comes_to_iphone_and_other_mobiles/#comment-17141441</link><description>I just switched back to NuevaSync for the time being while the rush dies down and Google gets their act together. I'm aware that Google Sync is free, but I can still complain when a service backed by such a large company performs so terribly.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">xxdesmus</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 15:45:20 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>