<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of pkitano</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/pkitano/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/pkitano/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:03:12 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: keyword order, word count and SEO | Wordtracker</title><link>(u'http://www.wordtracker.com/academy/keyword-order-word-count-and-search-engine-optimization-seo',%2080532792L)#comment-80532792</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I never realized people made careers out of word counts and keywords. Next, they'll call SEO a science.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 02 Mar 2008 18:04:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: democratic exclusivity</title><link>(u'http://www2.influxinsights.com/?p=1725',%20200447516L)#comment-200447516</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This expression is a contradiction in terms, an oxymoron. Democratic inplies popular participation while exclusivity implies that some "thing" is limited to a few. Democratic exclusivity is also a prejorative term in political science, implying that something that appears to be open is actually closed and shuts ordinary people out of the process.  I think you still need to search for a more apt catch phrase to get across your point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 04:34:31 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Study: There is No Tipping Point, Blog Readers Are Skeptical</title><link>(u'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/study_there_is_no_tipping_poin.php',%20110472084L)#comment-110472084</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This sounds about right from a layman's perspective. In my recent travels through the blogosphere, it seems like a lot of bloggers aimed at marketing and "innovation" are actually consultants throwing out catch phrases to see if any of them stick. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For some reasons, certain blogs are aggregated and distributed in amounts that are out of proportion to the value of their content. I guess they are considered "hot" but if you actually browse them, it's like the emperor's new clothes...there's nothing there. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Blah, blah, blah, all talk with no substance or originality. People reporting on other people's ideas and generating little content that can't be found a lot other "trendsetter's" blog, there is a lot of repackaging. Why not trust those you know, either in real life or virtually rather that some blogger who usually has mixed motives in promoting some product or idea?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 07:54:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: ROFLCon: It&amp;#8217;s Not Easy Being Memes</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/underwire/2008/04/its-hard-out-he/',%20125882698L)#comment-125882698</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Any way to get a printable version of this story? It's very difficult to print out blogs...the copy runs right off of one page instead of breaking up neatly into pages.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 05:08:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Enterprise 2.0 To Become a \$4.6 Billion Industry By 2013</title><link>(u'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/enterprise_20_to_become_a_46_billion_industry.php',%20110474267L)#comment-110474267</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"Commoditization"? This unword reminds me of "affordance", "componentry", "combinatorial", "criticality", "monotonicity", and "processible"...other nonwords I keep reading in technology business literature. You all should really look at a dictionary once in a while as there are actual words in the English language which convey the ideas I think you are aiming at. Reading these made-up, trying to sound fancy, nonwords is like hearing fingernails on a chalkboard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 15:38:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Great Ways to Contribute to Social Media</title><link>(u'http://www.readwriteweb.com/archives/5_ways_to_contribute_to_social.php',%20110477342L)#comment-110477342</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I love this wave of social media and networking but it has turned from fun to a bit of a chore. I've got too many connections/blogs/webpages to maintain. I need to downsize and concentrate on 2 or 3 rather getting on every site I'm invited to. You could spend your entire day just updating your info and responding to people. It like a social vortex.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 May 2008 10:45:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 7 Essential Web Design Principles to Earn Trust. And 4 Things to Avoid!</title><link>(u'http://www.10e20.com/blog/2008/01/11/essential-web-design-principles-to-earn-trust/',%2016683632L)#comment-16683632</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very valuable and frank. Thanks for the post!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 06:46:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live Streaming Bill Gates Keynote At Advance08</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/05/21/live-streaming-bill-gates-keynote-at-advance08/',%2071698229L)#comment-71698229</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What do y'all think of the Live Search Cash Back idea? I think it sounds kind of complicating (i.e., waiting 60 days for rebate) to really take off in a big way.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2008 17:29:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Phreadz - A Little Like Seesmic, But Trying To Do More</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/05/23/phreadz-a-little-like-seesmic-but-trying-to-do-more/',%2071704444L)#comment-71704444</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It's a good question though, how many social networks can a person keep up with and still 1) keep a job, 2) look after a family, and 3) have a real-life social life. I'm on about 7 and it's just too many especially when some of the same people are on different networks. But which ones to cut out?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I expect some contraction in the growth of new social networks by the end of the summer. Put that in your calendar!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 May 2008 06:57:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter!</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/05/25/twitter-2/',%2071707646L)#comment-71707646</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, Twitter...where I can find out who just fed their cat, who is eating junk food and watching TV, and who is stuck at a boring meeting at work. How did I exist before Twitter to record the daily highs and lows of my life? And why do people care? They should pick up the phone or write a letter if they want to communicate...then they won't get random information about someone going to the gym or saying "hi" to some other friend you don't even know.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2008 22:47:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Marketing Sucks</title><link>(u'http://christopherspenn.com/2008/04/marketing-sucks/',%2067260725L)#comment-67260725</link><description>&lt;p&gt;"the corporate equivalent of that guy in the bar who smells of equal parts aggression, fear, and desperation"...BINGO!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That's what I think of when I surf marketing, business, and trend websites that are trying to "monetize" social networking sites. They see a big pool of potential customers and they are intensely frustrated that they don't have a piece of the action. They are furiously waving red flags at their colleagues shouting, "Look at all of these people over here!"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Then I chime in with my idealistic, "If you commercialize social networking (more than it already is), you'll kill it completely. People won't Twitter or MySpace or FaceBook or MeetUp or whatever if they are going to have to fend off marketing pitches or, worse, attempts at viral marketing that are patently obvious. The appeal of these places is that people can connect with others who they share some commonality with (sports, music, industry, high school, etc.).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Corporations will never create genuine social networks on their own sites that can replicate this. The only exception I can think of is user support sites like Microsoft or other technology discussion boards but the reason most people visit those sites is because their software ISN'T working, not to compliment Microsoft on their fine, fine products. Second Life is commercialized but users can control how deeply they want to get into that virtual world.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It seems like marketers also want to control the message. You put up a Coke Fans bulletin board and there will be as many "Coke sucks" messages as people who like their product. But if you put in a moderating system, it drives people away in droves.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Basically, the day marketers control or influence online social networking (any more than they do), is the day it dies. People will just move on to something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;End of rant. I just get a little sick reading marketing blogs that treat the "masses" as merely potential revenue sources. And most people are smart enough now to smell their contempt and stay away from contrived marketing campaigns. I'll step off my soapbox now.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 07:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The MacBook Air: Thin Enough To Slice A Cake</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/01/the-macbook-air-thin-enough-to-slice-a-cake/',%2071727137L)#comment-71727137</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What a waste of a computer...you'll never get all of the frosting out.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:53:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Like.com%26%23039%3Bs+Creepy%2C+But+Effective%2C+Facebook%26nbsp%3BAds</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/01/likecoms-creepy-facebook-ads/',%2071726791L)#comment-71726791</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You really think some program has coded every photo on Facebook for its content? There must be millions of personal photos, it wouldn't be cost effective to do something like this in the off-hand chance someone would click on an ad.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 12:56:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bezos Talks Web Services</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/01/bezos-talks-web-services/',%2071726656L)#comment-71726656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cloud computing is on the rise but it seems like it increases a company's vulnerability to have its data stored in several geographically distant locations that are out of its direct control. Or do I not "get" it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:05:46 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Technorati+Founder+Dave+Sifry+Takes+On+Travel+Guide%26nbsp%3BIndustry</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/01/technorati-founder-dave-sifry-takes-on-travel-guide-industry/',%2071726418L)#comment-71726418</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The customization sounds great, something I'd pay for. But "lifting" content created in a wiki leaves a sour taste in my mouth and would cause me to pass. If it's not original content, I can find the same information myself on the web. It would cost me time but there is a ton of free information out there already I can locate myself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Bottom line, I'd purchase customized travel info from some company that actually had done some legwork and visited these locations, but not an armchair travel aggregator. I'll take a look at their sample but if it is created in the manner described above, I'll wait for some well-weathered travel guide company to get on the ball and create something similar.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2008 13:20:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mozilla Firefox 3.0 Is the Best Browser for Web &amp;#8212; For Now</title><link>(u'http://allthingsd.com/20080605/mozilla-firefox-30-is-the-best-browser-for-web-for-now/',%2015683446L)#comment-15683446</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Just testing out Firefox 3 and it is definitely an improvement. I've used Firefox since Netscape went good-bye although I occasionally use Flock because it helps me keep up with my social networks.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 20:24:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple WWDC 2008 Keynote Live-Blogging Tomorrow</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/08/apple-wwdc-2008-keynote-live-blogging-tomorrow/',%2071746282L)#comment-71746282</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Can we expect the Rapture?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:17:09 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Videos: When Social Media enters Popular Culture</title><link>(u'http://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/06/07/videos-when-social-media-enters-popular-culture/',%2023790202L)#comment-23790202</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hadn't seen the Second Life one before. That's going up, yep!, on my Facebook page. Share the wealth!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:57:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Five Questions Companies Ask About Social Media</title><link>(u'https://www.web-strategist.com/blog/2008/06/06/the-five-questions-companies-ask-about-social-media/',%2023790197L)#comment-23790197</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting article. Speaking purely as a user, I think that corporate America has to accept that in the realm of social media, they have to give up some control about the message. I read some blogs and it's like marketing types want to attract consumers but also control what happens on the site.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But although people might visit or wander in, they won't stay unless they can have some influence (a voice). And I think a lot of corporate marketing types have a not-so-small contempt of the public and fear giving up the control that is required if a social networking site is going to thrive. You can't have it both ways, that is, attract users/viewers and also control what is being said/done on your site. There are just too many other competing forums where people can go which don't have restrictions beyond the "no flaming, obscene language or photos" maxim.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No one wants to belong to a policed social network and companies that don't realize this will have their carefully budgeted plans go down in flames. They have to accept that by opening up a blog to comments or creating a discussion forum or asking for user-created content, there might very well be some veiled or direct criticism of the company and it's positions. It would be best if they had a sense of humor about it and didn't try to silence those who are saying something they don't want to hear. It could be much more valuable to the company than bland compliments.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 15:09:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Games Begin: Live Coverage Of Apple WWDC Event In San Francisco</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/09/the-games-begin-live-coverage-of-apple-wwwc-event-in-san-francisco/',%2071747983L)#comment-71747983</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Don't wait until 10 am to look for seats!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 11:46:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: %24199+iPhone%3F+Sure%2C+with+a+2-year%26nbsp%3Bcontract</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/09/199-iphone-sure-with-a-2-year-contract/',%2071748806L)#comment-71748806</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm not a big AT&amp;amp;T fan....&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:43:39 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Fails To Fail, Community Rejoices</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/10/twitter-fails-to-fail-community-rejoices/',%2071751528L)#comment-71751528</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Tell me that the ban was a joke! He was telling the truth, there were two times I couldn't view Techcrunch--hey, we were looking at it and constantly refreshing--so you shouldn't ban him from stating that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for Twitter, the only problem I had him was immediately after the Jobs talk ended. I assume the attendees pulled their cell phones out and tweeted away.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 05:51:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Fails To Fail, Community Rejoices</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/10/twitter-fails-to-fail-community-rejoices/',%2071751669L)#comment-71751669</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Okay, but I'm going to form a "Banned from TechCrunch" Facebook page complete with video blog.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Nah, it's too damn hot right now and I haven't had my coffee. Whim passes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 06:47:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am A Member Of The Cult Of iPhone</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/10/i-am-a-member-of-the-cult-of-iphone/',%2071752157L)#comment-71752157</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hear that there is a great deprogramming treatment facility for this in Redmond, WA.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 08:09:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: I Am A Member Of The Cult Of iPhone</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2008/06/10/i-am-a-member-of-the-cult-of-iphone/',%2071752330L)#comment-71752330</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think I belong to the Cult of the Keyboard...not sure I'll ever be totally won over by a touchscreen. I'm a typer, not a poker.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Liz</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:03:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>