<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of scorpfromhell</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/scorpfromhell/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/scorpfromhell/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:50:41 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Why @bubbawatson Had Such A Cool Tweet</title><link>(u'http://scottschnaars.com/2009/10/08/why-bubbawatson-had-such-a-cool-tweet/',%2019662362L)#comment-19662362</link><description>&lt;p&gt;So the PGA is smarter than both the NFL and professional Tennis?  (no backlash about players using social media).  Excellent! Comments on NFL &amp;amp; Tennis here: &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/26PhnS" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/26PhnS"&gt;http://bit.ly/26PhnS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 10:07:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: You should lead from the middle</title><link>(u'http://blog.penelopetrunk.com/2010/01/13/you-should-lead-from-the-middle/',%20182465111L)#comment-182465111</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting arguments for and against -- but I'm going to side with Penelope.  I think the tide is turning.  Participation has been a good idea since at least the 70s, but now we have more efficient and broad reaching ways to practice it.  Our environment is also now so complex that it demands the full engagement of all levels of the organization for success.  Great book just came out "The New How" - big focus on value of transparency  &lt;a href="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596156268" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://oreilly.com/catalog/9780596156268"&gt;http://oreilly.com/catalog/...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I reviewed it and discussed some of the above at &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/11/06/transparency-the-new-how-e20/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/11/06/transparency-the-new-how-e20/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 21:31:28 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sciencefeed Launches Friendfeed-Like Platform For Scientists</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2010/02/15/sciencefeed-launches-friendfeed-like-platform-for-scientists/',%2071131220L)#comment-71131220</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm working on a series of blog posts &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/dnls9D" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/dnls9D"&gt;http://bit.ly/dnls9D&lt;/a&gt; focused on innovation infrastructure.  First question that comes to mind is  how to help people make the decision about which site is the hub and what to push out too. Links to PubMed etc could mean sites like this become the hub.  Other examples that would support this thought?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 12:23:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Clive Thompson on the Cyborg Advantage</title><link>(u'http://www.wired.com/magazine/2010/03/st_thompson_cyborgs/',%20134420118L)#comment-134420118</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Enjoyed reading this along side Tom Malone's recent article in MIT Sloan Management Review &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/aT6RRo" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/aT6RRo"&gt;http://bit.ly/aT6RRo&lt;/a&gt;  My colleagues and I are doing research related to the personal quest Clive mentions.  We call it systems savvy and are working to measure and help people build this capability.  More on this and the connection to Malone's work here: &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/03/24/cyborgs-weavers-let-systems-savvy-guide/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/03/24/cyborgs-weavers-let-systems-savvy-guide/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:08:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Should+Tech+Startups+Outsource+Product%26nbsp%3BDevelopment%3F</title><link>(u'http://techcrunch.com/2010/04/17/should-tech-startups-outsource-product-development/',%2071301604L)#comment-71301604</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I teach tech &amp;amp; innov management and usually use Chesbrough &amp;amp; Teece's work to show the options for staying in house or not.  I think your article is a push to make the perspective richer -- where along a continuum is the R&amp;amp;D in terms of complexity &amp;amp; uniqueness?; how deep will the relationship be over time?  Open innovation can mean deep partnerships as some of the other commenters describe.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 11:24:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are We Entering the Era of Mobile Video Chat?</title><link>(u'http://theanywhereoffice.com/digital-lifestyle/the-era-of-mobile-video-chat.htm',%2062274029L)#comment-62274029</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a big fan of the use of props in video -- when you need them to show a product, solve a problem etc.  I'm less certain that it's better to be on video just to see a talking head.  I posted this &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/06/17/another-reason-to-not-use-causal-videoconferencing/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/06/17/another-reason-to-not-use-causal-videoconferencing/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt; after a communication class I took with Decker.  Maybe the difference with a phone based system is that you can walk around and be more energetic?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 16:51:04 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Are We Entering the Era of Mobile Video Chat?</title><link>(u'http://theanywhereoffice.com/digital-lifestyle/the-era-of-mobile-video-chat.htm',%2063654422L)#comment-63654422</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Phil,&lt;br&gt;What a thoughtful reply.  I think I have another example (from my own blog, no less) that supports your point: &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/12/17/one-team-many-places-microsoft/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2009/12/17/one-team-many-places-microsoft/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt;  Stuart and the Microsoft team have huge experience and spend the time to work with video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and I'm about to call "uncle" and get an iPhone 4.  Rest of the family is on Facetime and I'm left out.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 01:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 rules for better communication in virtual teams</title><link>(u'http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9179543/6_rules_for_better_communication_in_virtual_teams',%20231734973L)#comment-231734973</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Email in Virtual Teams - How about a blended approach?&lt;br&gt;I'll be sharing this set of suggestions, but I'd like to add a twist.  Email has it's value, but I find virtual teams gaining greater overall collaboration value from using project-focused wiki/blogs/creation spaces.  As you note, emails are hard to manage.  Especially true when people are on multiple project teams.  A collaboration platform that allows all the communication to stay in one place - perhaps using email as a signal that action is needed - is a good addition.  Full blog on topic here: Kill email, or keep your enemies closer &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/04/14/kill-email-keep-your-enemies-closer/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/04/14/kill-email-keep-your-enemies-closer/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Would love to know if collaboration platforms have worked in your settings.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:15:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Google Wave Decision Shows Strong Innovation Management</title><link>(u'http://blogs.hbr.org/hbsfaculty/2010/08/google-wave-decision-shows-str.html',%2067367425L)#comment-67367425</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm giving my "like" to all the comments that hit on the lack of implementation.  Conferences seemed to have good use of Wave -- but the conference organizers may have been doing the implementation for Google in those cases.  (I'd love to hear from someone who participated in a Wave-supported conference.)  I have a post with a more complete discussion of why the "silver bullet" approach won't work: &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/08/09/silver-bullets-cant-hit-target-google-wave-shut-down/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/08/09/silver-bullets-cant-hit-target-google-wave-shut-down/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 10:41:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Is Social Intranet a Collaboration Solution?</title><link>(u'http://www.cmswire.com/cms/enterprise-20/is-social-intranet-a-collaboration-solution-008309.php',%20175227018L)#comment-175227018</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think the access, attract, achieve ideas from The Power of Pull (Hagel, Seely Brown &amp;amp; Davison) could be helpful.  We use social , both individually, in teams, and organizationally to access people and resources, attract people and resources to our task/project, and then hopefully weave it together to achieve.  &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I talk a bit about the weaving aspect here: &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/08/12/systems-savvy-power-of-pull/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/08/12/systems-savvy-power-of-pull/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/08/12/systems-savvy-power-of-pull/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Appreciate your editorial links -- nice to be able to follow-up&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:04:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Guesswork of Science</title><link>(u'http://andrewmcafee.org/2010/09/mcafee_guesswork_of_science/',%2080354040L)#comment-80354040</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm always looking for great ways to teach evidence-based management to MBA students.  Would add Pfeffer &amp;amp; Sutton's book (and the HBR article) Hard Facts to the list of resources.  They also provide info here: &lt;a href="http://www.evidence-basedmanagement.com/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.evidence-basedmanagement.com/"&gt;http://www.evidence-basedma...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also good: video of Marissa Meyer talking at Stanford: Data is Apolitical &lt;a href="http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1529" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://ecorner.stanford.edu/authorMaterialInfo.html?mid=1529"&gt;http://ecorner.stanford.edu...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 14:36:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 6 Tips for Tapping the Remote Workforce</title><link>(u'http://distractedenterprise.com/index.php/6-tips-for-tapping-the-remote-workforce/',%2086923154L)#comment-86923154</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd add one general capability for tying together the above tasks: Be able at any time to see where the work has been and is going.  I think we used to do that tacitly when we all worked face to face (last time I did that was 1983). Now, any combination that lets us rewind to see how we've gotten here, check in on what's currently happening, and as you &amp;amp; Huddle note, know where we're going with a clear goal.  I'd hoped Wave was going to bring us there, but I suppose we're back to crafting such capabilities ourselves.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 11:16:08 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Different Kind of Power &amp;#038; Politics</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/11/02/different-kind-power-politics/',%2094188479L)#comment-94188479</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would love your opinion on how Wikileaks fits in (or doesn't)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 11:42:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Different Kind of Power &amp;#038; Politics</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/11/02/different-kind-power-politics/',%2099006889L)#comment-99006889</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Would love to see the data on whistle blowing now that social media are in the mix.  I do think we have some new insights that would have been harder to track before the technology reduced the friction of spreading the word.  Watching TSA developments around screening is another interesting example.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:19:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: A Different Kind of Power &amp;#038; Politics</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/11/02/different-kind-power-politics/',%20106253596L)#comment-106253596</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You raise another good angle, with wide spread communication, I wonder if the risks to whistle blowing aren't even higher? What would have been spread in the smaller network of our "industry" can now be found more broadly.  On the flip side, more companies that want to be known for ethical behavior and transparency might give homes to ousted whistle blowers.  &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 01:11:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Live drawing from mngriffith | WebPad</title><link>(u'http://webpad.hk/q/e20eb91717e2e467c41e140658afbf82bfd56471',%20106519845L)#comment-106519845</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm commenting&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 18:16:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: AirVenture’s Electric Revolution: Sonex E-Flight Initiative</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/07/28/airventures-electric-revolution-sonex-e-flight-initiative/',%20107600638L)#comment-107600638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;.@SonexAircraft flew their first electric flight on Dec 3, 2011.  Well done Sonex team!  &lt;a href="http://www.eaa.org/news/2010/2010-12-03_Waiex_First2.asp" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.eaa.org/news/2010/2010-12-03_Waiex_First2.asp"&gt;http://www.eaa.org/news/201...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:40:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Own Your Own Tools</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2008/10/08/own-your-own-tools/',%20107915424L)#comment-107915424</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Citrix supports employees owning their devices &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/gHp3aH" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/gHp3aH"&gt;http://bit.ly/gHp3aH&lt;/a&gt; with Dilbert! My take &lt;a href="http://bit.ly/4rAVBe" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://bit.ly/4rAVBe"&gt;http://bit.ly/4rAVBe&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:18:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mixing Metaphors for Systems Savvy</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/12/13/mixing-metaphors-systems-savvy/',%20111299538L)#comment-111299538</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Love the idea of getting something new out of it.  I'll start looking for examples of transformations following a "mix."&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:24:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Mixing Metaphors for Systems Savvy</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/12/13/mixing-metaphors-systems-savvy/',%20120217443L)#comment-120217443</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Austin, you may have written my introduction for me -- thank you.  And thanks to all the comments below.  Clearly no single metaphor will do, and why should it?  My challenge will be to use each to find the trigger for the broadest number of readers, then to focus on a smaller subset throughout.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 14:23:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Lightweight Collaboration for Team Projects</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2011/01/03/lightweight-collaboration-team-projects/',%20123787656L)#comment-123787656</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the options.  Those are all new to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2011 01:22:42 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Three Personas of a Systems Savvy Manager</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2011/01/05/the-three-personas-of-a-systems-savvy-manager/',%20125079099L)#comment-125079099</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wolf, thanks for this.  Testing a variety of approaches, as you can see, and you are the focal audience.  What did you think about the cooking version, not focused on the chef, but cooking as a metaphor for the kind of blending we're talking about?  I love that this post  &lt;a href="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/12/28/cooking-metaphor-modern-management/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2010/12/28/cooking-metaphor-modern-management/"&gt;http://www.terrigriffith.co...&lt;/a&gt; was even translated into Spanish! &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:01:33 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Meeting Planning and Organization Imperative</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2011/01/23/the-meeting-planning-and-organization-imperative/',%20133998985L)#comment-133998985</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nancy, thank you for the clear list of great reasons to meet: When the work demands, trust, conflict, motivation/urgency.  I'm in complete agreement.  I try to offer my students &amp;amp; clients alternatives for meetings that may be called for historic, punitive, or top-down information sharing without a leadership reason.  Dashboards, wikis, narration of work, etc. are possibilities.  Any chance you already have a post on related topics?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:44:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Meeting Planning and Organization Imperative</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2011/01/23/the-meeting-planning-and-organization-imperative/',%20133999976L)#comment-133999976</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Austin.  Thank you -- value of video continues to grow in my mind as well.  My nirvana is Telepresence combined with shared live documents (like Google docs). Looking forward to both the pull for that work style and the capabilities being broadly felt.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:47:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Meeting Planning and Organization Imperative</title><link>(u'http://www.terrigriffith.com/blog/2011/01/23/the-meeting-planning-and-organization-imperative/',%20134001261L)#comment-134001261</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you Julia.  The comments to this post are incredibly valuable.  The invitation list hits home to many of the problems we talked about and all see.  I'm trying to push an idea of core versus adjunct membership on teams, and then using narration (wikis, great notes like &lt;a href="http://facilitate.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="facilitate.com"&gt;facilitate.com&lt;/a&gt; provided to our meeting -- without a note taker), etc. so those note "at" the meeting are still aware of the process.  Do you have any examples to share on how such approaches have worked?  ... not inviting everyone: how you make the invitation without marginalizing other members, how you share the process and outcomes, etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Terri Griffith</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:50:41 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>