<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Friends of shinerweb</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/shinerweb/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/shinerweb/friends.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:34:56 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Shipping containers as housing</title><link>(u'http://dev.boingboing.net/?p=39058',%20208328163L)#comment-208328163</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a recent roundup of shipping container useage:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.notcot.com/archives/2007/10/shipping_contai.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.notcot.com/archives/2007/10/shipping_contai.php"&gt;http://www.notcot.com/archi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Shipping containers as&amp;nbsp;housing</title><link>(u'http://boingboing.net/2007/10/13/shipping-containers.html',%20226889344L)#comment-226889344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Here is a recent roundup of shipping container useage:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.notcot.com/archives/2007/10/shipping_contai.php" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.notcot.com/archives/2007/10/shipping_contai.php"&gt;http://www.notcot.com/archi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 13 Oct 2007 03:10:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/18547472',%209290L)#comment-9290</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 03:25:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/18897657',%2010350L)#comment-10350</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I know! I dont know if you noticed but I was helping to keep an eye on the road too.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 13:09:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pop17</title><link>(u'http://popsnap.net/',%2011008L)#comment-11008</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks, just testing an installation :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:25:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2011559L)#comment-11559</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It doesnt suprise me at all that he hasnt responded, its likely he is not actually looking for any help: I know he said in his initial request that he would pay for help, but later that day he said he wasnt willing to pay.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:38:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2011647L)#comment-11647</link><description>&lt;p&gt;You can say whatever you want but its pretty clear to me there is no match with what you say and what we have actually seen.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:13:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2011651L)#comment-11651</link><description>&lt;p&gt;It means I dont think you are describing what is actually there. You think Mahalo is one thing but it seems to be something else.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Still waiting on the good review. Can you point to a good review of Mahalo somewhere? Id like to read from someone else beside you or other people from Mahalo whats so good about it. Ive never heard anyone say anything good about Mahalo except for you.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:24:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2012059L)#comment-12059</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Ok, well the Scoble and NYTimes links are impressive but neither review Mahalo, they just mention what it is. The other links were not so impressive. Ill  post more on my findings in the next few days.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 21:48:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2012237L)#comment-12237</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I hear what you are saying and Im game to put myself in others' shoes. My point is that the site is working well when someone clicks on an ad and that, in my 'paternalistic' opinion, this is when it breaks down for the poor user who doesn't know better.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your link says "I think he is doing a good job" but I didn't see where you gave a positive review of his site. I noticed in the comments that you defended your post by suggesting you were not meaning to state your opinion about Mahalo.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coincidentally, after my thread here seemed to of dried up, just as your comment came in Duncan, 3 more comments came in at exactly the same time supporting Jason so Im wondering also if your comment was instigated by a nudge for a voucher?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As for the Martha of search, as we have all noticed, there sure is a lot of noise and crap that makes it way on to the table. Just because someone learns how to game Google doesn't make it taste good. ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 01:55:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2012254L)#comment-12254</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I knew there must be some :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Not that we need the A-listers to chime in (and we heard that Duncan thinks Jason is doing a good job), but why the lack of positive A-list reviews I wonder. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 02:55:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>(u'http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/',%2012564L)#comment-12564</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting. I would suggest that you were trying to act as a point of reason with this post, and take a journalistic approach, but clearly your linking practices (for deciding to link to Mahalo and not Rocketboom), is the sign that your NOT taking a journalistic stance, but rather taking a sides on a political platform.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thus, your argument broke down for me and I became disinterested in reading any further. . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:18:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Mahalo is Fundamentally Flawed</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19305296',%2012607L)#comment-12607</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Wow, this is getting REALLY interesting.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I cant help but notice that I usually get about 0 comments, or sometimes a few, but this thread gets so many comments in bursts all at once, way after the post is past due.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If anyone wants to take notice, there are many comments left by Dr. Mani which is the same person that left several comments under the name William Tildesley.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Listen to how "convinced" and "passionate" about Mahalo these commenters are too. Its as if they work for Mahalo or "something".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:57:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Blogosphere: The Enquirer For Geeks</title><link>(u'http://howtosplitanatom.com/news/blogosphere-the-enquirer-for-geeks/',%2012805L)#comment-12805</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey thanks for the note. My oversight entirely. And thank you for noticing that the main polemic continues to go unaddressed by most of the commenters. ;P&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 18:27:25 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19479243',%2013592L)#comment-13592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for writing in Tim, sounds like things are going well. I personally would like to see everyone on the list make it really big and superduper.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 23:45:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - 90% of Saturday Night Live Staff Fired</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19665649',%2014966L)#comment-14966</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Over 400 main stream news links here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;amp;q=SNL+fired&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wn" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://news.google.com/news?hl=en&amp;amp;q=SNL+fired&amp;amp;um=1&amp;amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;amp;sa=N&amp;amp;tab=wn"&gt;http://news.google.com/news...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 18 Nov 2007 18:22:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Crayon Physics Deluxe</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19758731',%2015827L)#comment-15827</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No need to be jelous because you'll be able to play with them :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 21:22:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Macy&amp;#039;s Thanksgiving Imperial Death March</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/19883899',%2017244L)#comment-17244</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Jimmy, its really easy to get the comments going. Just go here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://disqus.com/create/" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://disqus.com/create/"&gt;http://disqus.com/create/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;...and then fill out the data. Then follow instructions to add the snippits of code to your tubmlr blog. Let me know if you have a hard time with this. Also, you can contact Disques and they can prob help too, as could Tumblr.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Cheers!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:51:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The next step in Digg clones (Scripting News)</title><link>(u'http://www.scripting.com/stories/2007/11/26/theNextStepInDiggClones.html',%2019405L)#comment-19405</link><description>&lt;p&gt;We started with Pligg and eventually started to adopt it into our own. I would reccomend checking it out as a starting point.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 14:28:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Techcrunch: Sarah Meyers&amp;rsquo; Live Online TV Show</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/20511165',%2023231L)#comment-23231</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Well, because its live, its much more fun to interact with. But assuming most people will not be there in the moment, the show goes to instant archive and can be watched at anytime, just like a podcast.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While true, there are a lot of tech shows out there, how many daily updates are there? And out of the daily ones, how many good ones are there?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;We DO need some more. Especially as good as Sarah.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 30 Nov 2007 15:05:13 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/20910049',%2027432L)#comment-27432</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Whatever, I toally found this while I was alone. Email is old, Im taking full credit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:21:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Must Read Story on Quarterlife (Made for TV?)</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/20882241',%2027963L)#comment-27963</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think you really hit the nail on the head about the audience. The audience is just different. Even the same people are just in different modes, moods, positions and have different objectives. They see the world with a kind of experience and expectation thats different as well. The main thing is, they have a choice. Give a choice, new kinds of viewing patterns develop. . .&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 09:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - 8 Reasons Why The TV Studios Will Die</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/22117963',%2044234L)#comment-44234</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Come on Tim, after all of that, you didn't address the points. You cant argue that the studios are not mean because they provide content that people like and you cant argue that they will make it because they are smart. When you say that they are smarter than everyone else, you also miss the mark on addressing the points.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;You have some great perspectives Tim, lets see you address my claims. Im suggesting that regardless of the people in the businesses, the businesses themselves are not well positioned to make it.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 14:32:51 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Dembot - Flickr</title><link>(u'http://dembot.com/post/22192519',%2046103L)#comment-46103</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Woops! fixed, thanks for the note :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 21:31:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: What I&amp;#8217;ve learned in 2007</title><link>(u'http://scobleizer.com/2007/12/31/what-ive-learned-in-2007/',%209697487L)#comment-9697487</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Cheers Robert! As great as this post was, I have to say, it was just another post in context of all of the great posts you have cranked out, thanks for spreading all the great insights and info in such a positive way.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Plenty of good inspiration for 2008!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">andrewbaron</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 11:34:56 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>