<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Disqus - Latest Comments for thruflo</title><link>https://disqus.com/by/thruflo/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://disqus.com/thruflo/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:41:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Almond Biscotti</title><link>http://cookinsanity.com/recipes/almond-biscotti.html#comment-1770617704</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I can vouch for those biscotti :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2015 18:41:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: "We are not in the midst of a revolution,&lt;br /&gt; we are between revolutions"</title><link>http:/2014/02/14/opinion-justin-mcguirk-open-design-italian-furniture-industry/#comment-1246867638</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Disclaimer: I'm an OpenDesk founder.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Small items like a stool are not necessarily the best fit for distributed manufacturing - they use only part of a plywood sheet and are a hassle to make, especially if you're only after one piece. Which is not to say they can't be economically viable, eg if you make many at a time, or if you optimise a sheet layout with multiple pieces, as we do with the the Edie Set: &lt;a href="https://www.opendesk.cc/edie/edie-set" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.opendesk.cc/edie/edie-set"&gt;https://www.opendesk.cc/edi...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, if you take some of the designs from the OpenDesk site that use one or more sheets, like the Desk: &lt;a href="https://www.opendesk.cc/lean/desk" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.opendesk.cc/lean/desk"&gt;https://www.opendesk.cc/lea...&lt;/a&gt;, or Cafe table: &lt;a href="https://www.opendesk.cc/lean/cafe" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://www.opendesk.cc/lean/cafe"&gt;https://www.opendesk.cc/lea...&lt;/a&gt;, you'll find the price points (at c. £700 and c. £300 respectively) are already very competitive.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fundamentally, open making cuts out whole categories of cost (retail and distributer markups, stock holding) whilst expanding others (labour, materials). I realise the Guardian video highlighted the Edie Stool but I wonder whether it's insightful to use it to critique the economics of the new model when there are many products and scenarios where the trade-off already makes complete economic sense.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 11:10:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Conventional Wisdom on Business Plan Numbers in a Lean Startup is Wrong</title><link>http://thruflo.com/post/22449616494#comment-520959021</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Or if you want to draw a salary at some point ;)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Obviously actual financial planning can be more sophisticated. Somewhere behind all the clever spreadsheets, though, is a hard truth that income must exceed expenditure, once it all tallys up.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 11:09:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Conventional Wisdom on Business Plan Numbers in a Lean Startup is Wrong</title><link>http://thruflo.com/post/22449616494#comment-520956751</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, very true, although 18 months can fly by. This post was inspired by a conversation with a ceo I'm working with who is planning for revenue to start in Y2. For him, having a sense of what his costs (and thus income targets) might be in Y3 is important. Not that those guesses won't be revised.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 06 May 2012 11:04:12 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: WikiHouse / The Gwangju Prototype</title><link>http://www.wikihouse-cc.appspot.com/library/designs/26001#comment-338477361</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Andreas,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Check some of the early posts on &lt;a href="http://blog.wikihouse.cc" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.wikihouse.cc"&gt;http://blog.wikihouse.cc&lt;/a&gt; -- there's some photos of the structure at Gwangju.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:28:43 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://wikihouse-cc.appspot.com/library/design/6001</title><link>http://wikihouse-cc.appspot.com/library/design/6001#comment-281317009</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test comment (dev thread).&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:59:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: http://localhost:8080/library/design/13</title><link>http://localhost:8080/library/design/13#comment-281297892</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Test comment, please ignore.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 11:34:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Bitcoin Will Fail As A Currency</title><link>http://tav.espians.com/why-bitcoin-will-fail-as-a-currency.html#comment-224654997</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hiya,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've very new to this subject and intellectual terrain.  However, it seems to me that &lt;a href="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths#Finite_coins_plus_lost_coins_means_deflationary_spiral" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Myths#Finite_coins_plus_lost_coins_means_deflationary_spiral"&gt;https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/...&lt;/a&gt; addresses the core point of this article.  The key point is that the rise in value through hoarding is offset by "human factors".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As others have said in the comments, it's a "self correcting problem".  Tav, do you have a counter to this specific point, or do you agree?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Jun 2011 04:41:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Elements of Knowledge and Embracing Social Media Theory</title><link>http://www.brasstackthinking.com/2011/01/elements-of-knowledge-and-embracing-social-media-theory/#comment-126800735</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I just finished reading a fascinating book -- &lt;a href="http://t.co/EblD2tj" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://t.co/EblD2tj"&gt;http://t.co/EblD2tj&lt;/a&gt; -- which walks through the whole of human history and ends with a chapter on what the lessons of the past show us about the future.  According to the book, the future is a battle between the Singularity and Nightfall.  Will we transcend biology and become a whole new type of interconnected intelligence or will we destroy civilization in all out nuclear war?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ruminate on that for a little while and then go and check your Twitter stream.  Trivial, mindless, self serving inanity, isn't it?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jan 2011 09:36:58 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s time to nut up or shut up</title><link>https://blog.asmartbear.com/nut-up-or-shut-up.html#comment-141430850</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yup, forgive the slightly facile comment.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's pretty clear from the price and the feature set that you're targeting "serious" bloggers, which makes a lot of sense given the plethora of free(mium) offers out there.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Aka, scratching your own itch ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:43:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It&amp;#8217;s time to nut up or shut up</title><link>https://blog.asmartbear.com/nut-up-or-shut-up.html#comment-141430513</link><description>&lt;p&gt;$49 Monthly -- that goes past my pain point.  Ouch.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:06:30 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Facebook Co-Founder Is Building a Social Network for Non-Profits [VIDEO]</title><link>http://mashable.com/2010/09/20/jumo-non-profit-social-network/#comment-79797549</link><description>&lt;p&gt;What about &lt;a href="http://openideo.com?" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://openideo.com?"&gt;http://openideo.com?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 15:59:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How To Facilitate Insights</title><link>http://www.psfk.com/2010/09/how-to-facilitate-insights.html#comment-75750271</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting post.  I wonder then if we brainstorm in order to make ourselves think.  It may be we'd be better thinking in a calm, quiet environment but that we just wouldn't.  We'd doodle and go and see what's on TV.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I've noticed something similar recently, having just read Barbara Minto's "Pyramid Principle" book, which advocates a way of thinking about writing.  The method, which I find very effective, requires serious thought to actually practice.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I notice that I have to force myself to do it.  However, I've noticed that when I'm in client workshops, thinking in pyramid logic is also very helpful and comes naturally.  I'd suggest that just being in the brainstorm with other people looking at us helps us get over the apathy to actually engage and perform.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 12:31:26 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Ad Agencies Are No Longer In Charge</title><link>http://cl.o.se/post/997940379#comment-70848139</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks very much :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There's a paradox there involving meeting someone who works for a service design agency.  I shan't attempt to explore it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:03:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why Ad Agencies Are No Longer In Charge</title><link>http://cl.o.se/post/997940379#comment-70846756</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very interesting link.  I see my post was a little fuzzy.  I also never anticipated coming across the phrase, "If you use this approach to analysing a toaster, there is no toaster" ;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The distinction between types of value reminded me of &lt;a href="http://blogs.hbr.org/haque/2009/07/the_value_every_business_needs.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blogs.hbr.org/haque/2009/07/the_value_every_business_needs.html"&gt;Umair Haque&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;Profit through economic harm to others results in what I've termed "thin value."  Thin value is an economic illusion: profit that is economically meaningless, because it leaves others worse off, or, at best, no one better off. ... The fundamental challenge for 21st Century businesses — and economies — is learning to create thick value. ... Thick value is sustainable, meaningful value.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I wonder whether Haque's "thick value" is Lucy's value-in-context.  If the challenge for 21st century businesses is to create meaningful, sustainable value then perhaps service design is the methodology through which to do that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:58:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: 5 Lessons from 150 startup pitches</title><link>http://blog.asmartbear.com/startup-lesson.html#comment-141430592</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm reading Steve Blank on Customer Development -- &lt;a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Four-Steps-Epiphany-Steven-Blank/dp/0976470705" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.amazon.co.uk/Four-Steps-Epiphany-Steven-Blank/dp/0976470705"&gt;http://www.amazon.co.uk/Fou...&lt;/a&gt; -- right now, so your "customer validation" points seem very familiar.  One thing that stands out as an 'in-book' reader of what I understand is a seminal text in this area is that you make no mention of what Blank calls Market Type.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'd be willing to bet that if your snapshot made those mistakes, they also tripped up on which market they were in and what that meant to their business model validation and sales and marketing processes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 08:33:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anatomy of a Noob &amp;#8211; Why your Mom Sucks at Computers</title><link>http://000fff.org/anatomy-of-a-noob-why-your-mom-suck-at-computers/#comment-58196974</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I guess the challenge (for post 2!) is addressing how to make things for "noobs" that aren't broken as a result.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Certainly, there is a learning pathway in most things from "entry level" to "expert tools".  For example, a programmer might start using :routes to map urls to handler code before moving on to mapping via regular expressions.  The former being simple but ultimately limited, the latter initially incomprehensible but much more powerful.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The holy grail is presumably 'unobtrusive' understandability, e.g.: page elements that contribute to understandability without getting in the way of usability.  But then, of course everything on the page gets in the way / occupies some visual hierarchy, which is precisely why the subtler arts of intution and metaphor are deployed.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;One pattern is to provide help context (e.g.: helpful 'tip' messages) the first time / few times something is used.  Perhaps another is to provide a default and 'advanced' modes, which the user explicitly activates to get rid of the 'helper' gunk once they've learned how to use something.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Personally, I find designing for myself to be infinitely more rewarding ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 04:57:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Anatomy of a Noob &amp;#8211; Why your Mom Sucks at Computers</title><link>http://000fff.org/anatomy-of-a-noob-why-your-mom-suck-at-computers/#comment-58109004</link><description>&lt;p&gt;An alternative conclusion might be "let's stop obsessing over noobs".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As &lt;a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/05/are-you-an-elite.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2010/05/are-you-an-elite.html"&gt;http://sethgodin.typepad.co...&lt;/a&gt; points out, we all have a choice over which audience we target and targeting the digital natives is in some cases the better approach.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 17:14:19 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Out of the cesspool and into the sewer: A/B testing trap</title><link>http://blog.asmartbear.com/local-minimum.html#comment-141430011</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Aka local adaptive peaks.  Welcome to pagerank...&lt;br&gt;.-= thruflo's latest blog post: &lt;a href="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/close/~3/a9HWMVwTirg/711528353" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/close/~3/a9HWMVwTirg/711528353"&gt;Why Accountants Don’t Run Startups.&lt;/a&gt; =-.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 11:00:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Ghost Protocol &amp;#8211; Digital Identity for Immortals</title><link>http://000fff.org/the-ghost-protocol-digital-identity-for-immortals/#comment-48335503</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'd be *very* interested in finding out about your new venture.  Interested enough to help ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 09:29:03 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: The Power of Digital Ecosystems</title><link>http://000fff.org/the-power-of-digital-ecosystems/#comment-37795123</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a lot to like in this post.  I find parallels between 'real' ecosystems and digital ecosystems fascinating.  I'd point to Stuart Kaufmann's books (e.g.: At Home in the Universe) for some fascinating material about how generic ecosystems behave (they tend to self-optimise to the "edge of chaos") which is applicable to the digital arena.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, being super critical, I'd suggest that the post is also a bit loose in places.  The playstation analogy is a bit confusing: the article is about the iPad, which is both a tighter and more relevant example.  Also the suggestion that the playstation was the first such digital ecosystem is a little fanciful.  Didn't people copy disks on the Amiga 500?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 08:49:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why App Engine Is Not Appropriate For Bootstrap</title><link>http://www.espians.com/why-app-engine-is-not-appropriate-for-bootstrap.html#comment-12179466</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The crux of the App Engine matter is that it is what it is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It's designed to support a certain class of app.  As the dev team behind it iterate, it may become appropriate for more apps.  The decision to use it must be bound to the specific use it needs to support.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For what it's worth, 30 sec request limit makes sense for the type of apps they've designed the platform for, the task queue api limit will clearly increase soon, possibly infinitely (at a cost).  Keys_only seems like a pretty good entitiy loading workaround and downtime?  You think you can do better?!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The map reduce pattern is on the dev teams' radar and the async is like it is bc they, too, have bills to pay.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:32:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: It's About Actualisation</title><link>http://www.thruflo.com/2009/04/29/its-about-actualisation.html#comment-10609167</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Amended with apologies...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 06:07:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pecu Allocations by Tav</title><link>http://www.asktav.com/pecu-allocations-by-tav.html#comment-7322247</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Woohoo!  I knew I was gonna rich be one day ;)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:55:05 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: BackTweets To Search Links On Twitter</title><link>http://blog.backtype.com/2009/03/backtweets-search-links-on-twitter/#comment-7255492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Gotcha; that makes a lot of sense!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks for quick reply :)&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;James.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">thruflo</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 11:27:40 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>